Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Institute for Cardiovascular Research (ICAR-VU), VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 13;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1989-x.
Insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) is common practice in critical care medicine. Complications arising from CVC placement are mostly due to a pneumothorax or malposition. Correct position is currently confirmed by chest x-ray, while ultrasonography might be a more suitable option. We performed a meta-analysis of the available studies with the primary aim of synthesizing information regarding detection of CVC-related complications and misplacement using ultrasound (US).
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis registered at PROSPERO (CRD42016050698). PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Articles which reported the diagnostic accuracy of US in detecting the position of CVCs and the mechanical complications associated with insertion were included. Primary outcomes were specificity and sensitivity of US. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of malposition and pneumothorax, feasibility of US examination, and time to perform and interpret both US and chest x-ray. A qualitative assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
We included 25 studies with a total of 2548 patients and 2602 CVC placements. Analysis yielded a pooled specificity of 98.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 97.8-99.5) and sensitivity of 68.2 (95% CI: 54.4-79.4). US examination was feasible in 96.8% of the cases. The prevalence of CVC malposition and pneumothorax was 6.8% and 1.1%, respectively. The mean time for US performance was 2.83 min (95% CI: 2.77-2.89 min) min, while chest x-ray performance took 34.7 min (95% CI: 32.6-36.7 min). US was feasible in 97%. Further analyses were performed by defining subgroups based on the different utilized US protocols and on intra-atrial and extra-atrial misplacement. Vascular US combined with transthoracic echocardiography was most accurate.
US is an accurate and feasible diagnostic modality to detect CVC malposition and iatrogenic pneumothorax. Advantages of US over chest x-ray are that it can be performed faster and does not subject patients to radiation. Vascular US combined with transthoracic echocardiography is advised. However, the results need to be interpreted with caution since included studies were often underpowered and had methodological limitations. A large multicenter study investigating optimal US protocol, among other things, is needed.
在重症监护医学中,中心静脉导管(CVC)的插入是常见的做法。CVC 放置引起的并发症主要是由于气胸或位置不当引起的。目前,导管的正确位置是通过胸部 X 光片确认的,而超声检查可能是更合适的选择。我们对现有研究进行了荟萃分析,主要目的是综合有关使用超声(US)检测 CVC 相关并发症和位置不当的信息。
这是一项在 PROSPERO(CRD42016050698)注册的系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。纳入了报告超声检测 CVC 位置和与插入相关的机械并发症的诊断准确性的文章。主要结局是超声的特异性和敏感性。次要结局包括位置不当和气胸的发生率、超声检查的可行性、以及进行 US 和胸部 X 光检查的时间。使用 QUADAS-2 工具进行定性评估。
我们纳入了 25 项研究,共 2548 名患者和 2602 例 CVC 放置。分析得出,超声的特异性为 98.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:97.8-99.5),敏感性为 68.2%(95%CI:54.4-79.4)。96.8%的病例可进行超声检查。CVC 位置不当和气胸的发生率分别为 6.8%和 1.1%。超声检查的平均时间为 2.83 分钟(95%CI:2.77-2.89 分钟),而胸部 X 光检查的时间为 34.7 分钟(95%CI:32.6-36.7 分钟)。97%的情况下可行超声检查。进一步的分析是根据不同的超声协议和心房内和心房外位置不当进行亚组分析。血管超声联合经胸超声心动图最准确。
超声是一种准确且可行的诊断方法,可用于检测 CVC 位置不当和医源性气胸。与胸部 X 光片相比,超声检查的优点是速度更快,且不会使患者暴露在辐射下。建议使用血管超声联合经胸超声心动图。然而,由于纳入的研究往往缺乏效力且存在方法学上的局限性,因此需要谨慎解释结果。需要进行一项大型多中心研究,以调查包括最佳超声协议在内的其他内容。