• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产品碳足迹信息及其获取难易程度对食品价值和主观质量的交互影响。

Interactive effects of carbon footprint information and its accessibility on value and subjective qualities of food products.

机构信息

Sensory & Cognitive Food Science Laboratory, National Food Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.013. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.013
PMID:20600412
Abstract

We aimed to explore the interactive effects of the accessibility of information and the degree of carbon footprint score on consumers' value judgments of food products. Participants (n=151, undergraduate students in Japan) rated their maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for four food products varying in information accessibility (active-search or read-only conditions) and in carbon footprint values (low, middle, high, or non-display) provided. We also assessed further effects of information accessibly and carbon footprint value on other product attributes utilizing the subjective estimation of taste, quality, healthiness, and environmental friendliness. Results of the experiment demonstrated an interactive effect of information accessibility and the degree of carbon emission on consumer valuation of carbon footprint-labeled food. The carbon footprint value had a stronger impact on participants' WTP in the active-search condition than in the read-only condition. Similar to WTP, the results of the subjective ratings for product qualities also exhibited an interactive effect of the two factors on the rating of environmental friendliness for products. These results imply that the perceived environmental friendliness inferable from a carbon footprint label contributes to creating value for a food product.

摘要

我们旨在探讨信息获取的便捷程度和碳足迹评分的程度对消费者对食品价值判断的交互影响。参与者(n=151,日本的本科生)对他们对四种食品的最大意愿支付(WTP)进行了评分,这些食品在信息获取便捷程度(主动搜索或只读条件)和碳足迹值(低、中、高或不显示)方面有所不同。我们还利用对味道、质量、健康和环境友好性的主观估计,评估了信息获取便捷程度和碳足迹值对其他产品属性的进一步影响。实验结果表明,信息获取便捷程度和碳排放程度对消费者对碳足迹标签食品的评估存在交互影响。在主动搜索条件下,碳足迹值对参与者 WTP 的影响比在只读条件下更强。与 WTP 类似,产品质量的主观评价结果也表现出这两个因素对产品环境友好性评价的交互作用。这些结果表明,从碳足迹标签推断出的环境友好性感知有助于为食品产品创造价值。

相似文献

1
Interactive effects of carbon footprint information and its accessibility on value and subjective qualities of food products.产品碳足迹信息及其获取难易程度对食品价值和主观质量的交互影响。
Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.013. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
2
Consumer valuation of packaged foods. Interactive effects of amount and accessibility of information.
Appetite. 2008 Nov;51(3):628-34. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.054. Epub 2008 May 21.
3
Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt.动物福利信息对消费者购买酸奶支付意愿的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Mar;91(3):910-7. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0709.
4
Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.消费者对增值鸡肉产品属性的偏好和支付意愿。
J Food Sci. 2011 Oct;76(8):S469-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02354.x.
5
Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers' perception of protein products.环保等于健康吗?瑞士消费者对蛋白质产品的看法。
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.038. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Exposure, health information and flavour-masking strategies for improving the sensory quality of probiotic juice.用于改善益生菌果汁感官品质的暴露、健康信息及风味掩盖策略。
Appetite. 2006 Nov;47(3):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
7
Consumers' ratings of the natural and unnatural qualities of foods.消费者对食品天然与非天然属性的评价。
Appetite. 2010 Jun;54(3):557-63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
8
Effect of a health claim and personal characteristics on consumer acceptance of fruit juices with different concentrations of açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.).健康声明和个人特征对消费者接受不同阿萨伊果(Euterpe oleracea Mart.)浓度果汁的影响。
Appetite. 2009 Aug;53(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.014. Epub 2009 May 23.
9
Consumer perception of the use of high-pressure processing and pulsed electric field technologies in food production.消费者对高压处理和脉冲电场技术在食品生产中的应用的认知。
Appetite. 2009 Feb;52(1):115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
10
Consumer perception of bread quality.消费者对面包品质的认知。
Appetite. 2009 Aug;53(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Would Altruistic Consumers Place A Higher Value on Sustainable Foods?利他主义消费者会更看重可持续食品吗?
Foods. 2023 Oct 9;12(19):3701. doi: 10.3390/foods12193701.
2
Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China.中国城市消费者对低碳农产品支付意愿的影响因素及群体差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010358.
3
The devil is not as black as he is painted? On the positive relationship between food industry conspiracy beliefs and conscious food choices.
“魔鬼并非如人们描绘的那样黑”?食品行业阴谋论信仰与有意识的食物选择之间存在正相关关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 16;17(8):e0272737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272737. eCollection 2022.
4
Testing hypothetical bias in a choice experiment: An application to the value of the carbon footprint of mandarin oranges.检验选择实验中的假设偏差:应用于蜜橘碳足迹的价值。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 18;17(1):e0261369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261369. eCollection 2022.
5
European Consumers' Perceptions and Attitudes towards Non-Thermally Processed Fruit and Vegetable Products.欧洲消费者对非热加工水果和蔬菜产品的认知与态度。
Foods. 2020 Nov 25;9(12):1732. doi: 10.3390/foods9121732.
6
Antibiotic use in poultry: a survey of eight farms in Thailand.抗生素在禽类养殖中的使用:泰国八家农场的调查。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Feb 1;96(2):94-100. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.195834. Epub 2017 Nov 27.