Gene. 2010 Oct 1;465(1-2):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
Peroxisomes are widespread eukaryotic organelles that show a high diversity in terms of metabolic functions. To explain their evolutionary origin, several endosymbiotic hypotheses have been put forward that suggest various possible prokaryotic ancestors. An alternative view proposes a scenario in which peroxisomes originated from the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Recently, an actinobacterial origin of peroxisomes have been proposed based on phylogenetic analysis of Pex1/6 proteins and the results of sequence comparisons of peroxisomal and bacterial proteins. Here we re-examine these data and show that the phylogenetic clustering of Pex1/6 proteins with actinobacterial proteins is likely the result of a long branch attraction artifact. Moreover, a statistical test shows that the phylogeny presented to support an actinobacterial origin is not significantly more supported than an alternative topology grouping Pex proteins with their Endoplasmic Reticulum homologs. We therefore conclude that there is a lack of phylogenetic support for a supposed actinobacterial origin of peroxisomes. Challenges for assessing the evolutionary origins of these intriguing organelles are discussed.
过氧化物酶体是广泛存在的真核细胞器,在代谢功能方面具有高度多样性。为了解释它们的进化起源,提出了几种内共生假说,提出了各种可能的原核祖先。另一种观点提出,过氧化物体起源于内质网。最近,根据 Pex1/6 蛋白的系统发育分析和过氧化物体与细菌蛋白的序列比较结果,提出了过氧化物体来源于放线菌的观点。在这里,我们重新检查了这些数据,并表明 Pex1/6 蛋白与放线菌蛋白的系统发育聚类很可能是长分支吸引 artifact 的结果。此外,统计检验表明,支持放线菌起源的系统发育与将 Pex 蛋白与其内质网同源物分组的替代拓扑结构相比,并没有得到更显著的支持。因此,我们得出的结论是,缺乏支持过氧化物体假定的放线菌起源的系统发育证据。讨论了评估这些有趣细胞器进化起源的挑战。