Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan;17(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
High-dose busulfan (Bu) is frequently used in preparative myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MAC and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) protocols for i.v. Bu infusion have been developed to achieve reliable systemic exposure while minimizing toxicity and treatment failure (relapse). The objectives of the present study were to (1) compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of i.v. Bu in different dosing protocols, (2) compare intrasubject variability of Bu PK over repeated administrations; (3) examine the effect of concomitant administration of fludarabine on Bu PK, and (4) examine the effect of plasma concentrations of glutathione (GSH), the cosubstrate in Bu metabolism, on Bu clearance. We studied Bu PK twice in each of 46 HSCT patients (after the first and then after the middle dose of the treatment cycle) receiving one of 4 dosing protocols, 2 MAC (cumulative dose, 12.8 mg/kg) and 2 RIC (cumulative dose, 6.4 mg/kg), with daily doses administered either as an individual infusion (3.2 mg/kg) or as 4 infusions of 0.8 mg/kg each. Blood samples were obtained for 6-24 hours after dosing for measurement of Bu plasma concentrations. PK parameters were estimated using compartmental analyses. In a subgroup of patients (n = 14), GSH blood concentrations were determined before Bu administration. Dose- and weight-corrected Bu PK parameters (clearance, 0.173 ± 0.051 L/hour · kg; volume of distribution, 0.71 ± 0.17 L/kg; half-life time, 3.0 ± 0.7 hours) did not differ among treatment protocols (all P >.14) and remained stable between the first and mid-cycle doses. Fludarabine did not affect Bu PK. Blood GSH concentrations before Bu dosing were positively correlated with Bu clearance (adjusted R(2) = 0.45; P = .009). Our data indicate that Bu PK parameters are linear, stable, and predictable in different i.v. protocols and are unaffected by coadministration of fludarabine. Differences in whole blood GSH might contribute to variability in Bu clearance.
高剂量白消安(Bu)常用于接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的患者的预处理骨髓清除性条件(MAC)方案中。已开发出静脉内 Bu 输注的 MAC 和减低强度条件(RIC)方案,以在最大限度减少毒性和治疗失败(复发)的同时实现可靠的全身暴露。本研究的目的是:(1)比较不同剂量方案中静脉内 Bu 的药代动力学(PK);(2)比较重复给药时 Bu PK 的个体内变异性;(3)检查氟达拉滨对 Bu PK 的影响,以及(4)检查 Bu 代谢的共底物谷胱甘肽(GSH)的血浆浓度对 Bu 清除率的影响。我们在接受四种方案之一治疗的 46 例 HSCT 患者中(在治疗周期的第一和中间剂量后)两次研究了 Bu PK,这四种方案包括两种 MAC(累积剂量 12.8 mg/kg)和两种 RIC(累积剂量 6.4 mg/kg),每日剂量分别作为单个输注(3.2 mg/kg)或 4 个 0.8 mg/kg 的输注给予。在给药后 6-24 小时采集血样以测量 Bu 血浆浓度。使用房室分析估算 PK 参数。在患者亚组(n = 14)中,在 Bu 给药前测定 GSH 血浓度。剂量和体重校正的 Bu PK 参数(清除率,0.173 ± 0.051 L/小时·kg;分布容积,0.71 ± 0.17 L/kg;半衰期,3.0 ± 0.7 小时)在不同的治疗方案中没有差异(所有 P >.14),并且在第一和中间周期剂量之间保持稳定。氟达拉滨不影响 Bu PK。Bu 给药前的血液 GSH 浓度与 Bu 清除率呈正相关(调整 R2 = 0.45;P =.009)。我们的数据表明,Bu PK 参数在不同的静脉内方案中是线性的、稳定的和可预测的,并且不受氟达拉滨联合给药的影响。全血 GSH 的差异可能导致 Bu 清除率的变异性。