Alberta Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Foothills Hospital, and Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331-29th Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;18(2):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.015. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
Intravenous (i.v.) busulfan (Bu) administered once daily in myeloablative transplant regimens is convenient, effective, and relatively well tolerated. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended as nonrelapse mortality increases when daily exposure, as determined by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), exceeds 6000 μM·min. We describe sequential studies to achieve accurate prediction of treatment doses of Bu based on the kinetics of a smaller test dose. A total of 335 patients with hematologic malignancies were given daily i.v. Bu 3.2 mg/kg × 4 and fludarabine 50 mg/m(2) × 5. Pharmacokinetic monitoring was conducted for both the test dose and first treatment dose of Bu (day -5). Three different test dose schedules were evaluated: 12 mg Bu administered over 20 minutes, 0.8 mg/kg over 3 hours, and 0.8 mg/kg infused at 80 mg/h. The 3.2 mg/kg treatment doses were infused over a fixed time of 3 hours for the first 2 test dose trials and at a fixed rate of 80 mg/h for the final protocol. All test dose infusions were on day -7. In the first 2 schedules, Bu administered over a fixed time had significantly higher clearance for the test dose compared with the treatment dose. However, when both the test and the treatment doses were administered at the same infusion rate, clearance of the drug between the 2 dosing days was equivalent. Predicted day -5 AUC (AUC(-5)) showed a high linear correlation (r(2) = 0.74) to the actual AUC(-5). The error of these predictions was <20% in 98% of patients and <10% in 80%. In 24 individuals, the test dose predicted an AUC >5500 μM·min; therefore, the first Bu treatment dose was reduced to a desired target AUC. All adjusted doses fell within 20% of the targeted exposure. We conclude that a test dose strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring of daily i.v. Bu is accurate if the test and treatment doses are infused at the same rate. This approach allows targeting of therapeutic doses of Bu to desired levels and the potential for improved safety and efficacy.
静脉注射(i.v.)白消安(Bu)在清髓性移植方案中每天一次给药,方便、有效且相对耐受良好。由于非复发死亡率增加,因此建议进行治疗药物监测,这是因为通过血浆浓度与时间曲线下面积(AUC)确定的每日暴露量(AUC)超过 6000 μM·min。我们描述了一系列研究,以根据较小测试剂量的动力学准确预测 Bu 的治疗剂量。共有 335 例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者接受静脉注射 3.2 mg/kg×4 天的 Bu 和 50 mg/m2×5 天的氟达拉滨。对测试剂量和 Bu 的第一次治疗剂量(第-5 天)均进行了药代动力学监测。评估了三种不同的测试剂量方案:20 分钟内给予 12 mg Bu,3 小时内给予 0.8 mg/kg,80 mg/h 输注 0.8 mg/kg。前 2 次试验中,所有 3.2 mg/kg 的治疗剂量均在 3 小时内固定时间输注,最后一次方案中以 80 mg/h 的固定速率输注。所有测试剂量输注均在第-7 天进行。在前 2 个方案中,与治疗剂量相比,固定时间给药的 Bu 测试剂量清除率显著更高。然而,当测试剂量和治疗剂量以相同的输注速率给药时,2 个给药日之间的药物清除率是等效的。预测的第-5 天 AUC(AUC(-5))与实际 AUC(-5)高度线性相关(r(2) = 0.74)。这些预测的误差在 98%的患者中<20%,在 80%的患者中<10%。在 24 个人中,测试剂量预测 AUC>5500 μM·min;因此,将 Bu 的第一次治疗剂量减少至所需的目标 AUC。所有调整剂量均在目标暴露量的 20%范围内。我们得出结论,如果以相同的速率输注测试剂量和治疗剂量,则 Bu 的每日静脉注射治疗药物监测的测试剂量策略是准确的。这种方法可以将 Bu 的治疗剂量靶向到所需水平,并有可能提高安全性和疗效。