• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒性休克的液体治疗。

Fluid therapy in septic shock.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Aug;16(4):297-308. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833be8b3.

DOI:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833be8b3
PMID:20601867
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the role of fluid therapy in the pathogenesis of severe sepsis and septic shock. The type, composition, titration, management strategies and complications of fluid administration will be examined in respect to outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fluids have a critical role in the pathogenesis and treatment of early resuscitation of severe sepsis and septic shock.

SUMMARY

Although this pathogenesis is evolving, early titrated fluid administration modulates inflammation, improves microvascular perfusion, impacts organ function and outcome. Fluid administration has limited impact on tissue perfusion during the later stages of sepsis and excess fluid is deleterious to outcome. The type of fluid solution does not seem to influence these observations.

摘要

目的综述

探讨液体疗法在严重脓毒症和感染性休克发病机制中的作用。本文将从预后角度探讨液体的输注类型、组成、滴定、管理策略和并发症。

最近的发现

液体在严重脓毒症和感染性休克早期复苏的发病机制和治疗中具有关键作用。

总结

尽管这一发病机制正在不断发展,但早期滴定的液体管理可调节炎症、改善微血管灌注、影响器官功能和预后。在脓毒症的后期阶段,液体的输入对组织灌注的影响有限,过多的液体对预后有害。液体溶液的类型似乎并不影响这些观察结果。

相似文献

1
Fluid therapy in septic shock.脓毒性休克的液体治疗。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Aug;16(4):297-308. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32833be8b3.
2
Urgent care in gynaecology: resuscitation and management of sepsis and acute blood loss.妇科急症:脓毒症和急性失血的复苏与处理。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Oct;23(5):679-90. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
3
[The nonlinear relationship between the resuscitation therapy and intensive insulin therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock patients].[严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者复苏治疗与强化胰岛素治疗之间的非线性关系]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2010 Jun;22(6):358-60.
4
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
5
[The therapeutic effects of fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock].[液体复苏在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的治疗作用]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Oct 1;44(19):1336-8.
6
Early goal-directed therapy: on terminal life support?早期目标导向治疗:走向生命终末期支持?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;28(2):243-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.11.014.
7
How to guide volume expansion in severe sepsis and septic shock patients? Possibilities in the real world.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者如何进行容量复苏?现实世界中的可能性。
Shock. 2013 May;39 Suppl 1:38-41. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31828faf4a.
8
[The effect of early goal-directed therapy on treatment of critical patients with severe sepsis/septic shock: a multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study].早期目标导向治疗对严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克重症患者的治疗效果:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2010 Jun;22(6):331-4.
9
Impact of the implementation of a sepsis protocol for the management of fluid-refractory septic shock: A single-center, before-and-after study.实施脓毒症管理液体难治性脓毒性休克方案的影响:一项单中心前后对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2010 Jul;32(7):1285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.07.003.
10
Choice of Fluid Therapy in the Initial Management of Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock.脓毒症、严重脓毒症及脓毒性休克初始治疗中的液体疗法选择
Shock. 2016 Jul;46(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000577.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between the rate of fluid resuscitation and acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort study.液体复苏速率与急性肾损伤之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;13(3):104-110. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_7_23. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
2
Effects of Fluids on the Sublingual Microcirculation in Sepsis.液体对脓毒症患者舌下微循环的影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 8;11(24):7277. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247277.
3
Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies for Obese Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review.
肥胖脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者液体复苏策略的效果:一项系统评价
Intensive Care Res. 2023;3(1):61-68. doi: 10.1007/s44231-022-00019-y. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Effect of initial infusion rates of fluid resuscitation on outcomes in patients with septic shock: a historical cohort study.初始输液复苏率对感染性休克患者结局的影响:一项历史队列研究。
Crit Care. 2020 Apr 7;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2819-5.
5
The Impact of EGDT on Sepsis Mortality in a Single Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon.早期目标导向治疗对黎巴嫩一家三级医疗中心脓毒症死亡率的影响。
Emerg Med Int. 2019 Jan 15;2019:8747282. doi: 10.1155/2019/8747282. eCollection 2019.
6
Unintended Consequences: Fluid Resuscitation Worsens Shock in an Ovine Model of Endotoxemia.意外后果:液体复苏在羊内毒素血症模型中加重休克。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1043-1054. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0064OC.
7
Fluid responsiveness raises many questions-echocardiography may be the answer.液体反应性引发了许多问题——超声心动图可能是答案。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Apr;9(4):946-949. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.146.
8
Comparative evaluation of central venous pressure and sonographic inferior vena cava variability in assessing fluid responsiveness in septic shock.在脓毒性休克中评估液体反应性时中心静脉压与超声下腔静脉变异度的比较评价
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;20(12):708-713. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.195706.
9
Early Liberal Fluid Therapy for Sepsis Patients Is Not Harmful: Hydrophobia Is Unwarranted but Drink Responsibly.脓毒症患者早期采用自由液体疗法并无危害:无需恐惧,但需合理补液。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):2263-2269. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002145.
10
Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期目标导向治疗:与ProCESS、ProMISe和ARISE研究的见解及比较
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 1;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1288-3.