Suppr超能文献

出血期间动脉与中心静脉血气分析不匹配。

Mismatch of arterial and central venous blood gas analysis during haemorrhage.

机构信息

Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;27(10):890-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833adea8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Arterial base excess and lactate levels are key parameters in the assessment of critically ill patients. The use of venous blood gas analysis may be of clinical interest when no arterial blood is available initially.

METHODS

Twenty-four pigs underwent progressive normovolaemic haemodilution and subsequent progressive haemorrhage until the death of the animal. Base excess and lactate levels were determined from arterial and central venous blood after each step. In addition, base excess was calculated by the Van Slyke equation modified by Zander (BE(z)). Continuous variables were summarized as mean +/- SD and represent all measurements (n = 195).

RESULTS

Base excess according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for arterial blood was 2.27 +/- 4.12 versus 2.48 +/- 4.33 mmol(-l) for central venous blood (P = 0.099) with a strong correlation (r(2) = 0.960, P < 0.001). Standard deviation of the differences between these parameters (SD-DIFBE) did not increase (P = 0.355) during haemorrhage as compared with haemodilution. Arterial lactate was 2.66 +/- 3.23 versus 2.71 +/- 2.80 mmol(-l) in central venous blood (P = 0.330) with a strong correlation (r(2) = 0.983, P < 0.001). SD-DIFLAC increased (P < 0.001) during haemorrhage. BE(z) for central venous blood was 2.22 +/- 4.62 mmol(-l) (P = 0.006 versus arterial base excess according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) with strong correlation (r(2) = 0.942, P < 0.001). SD-DIFBE(z)/base excess increased (P < 0.024) during haemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Central venous blood gas analysis is a good predictor for base excess and lactate in arterial blood in steady-state conditions. However, the variation between arterial and central venous lactate increases during haemorrhage. The modification of the Van Slyke equation by Zander did not improve the agreement between central venous and arterial base excess.

摘要

背景与目的

动脉碱剩余和乳酸水平是评估危重病患者的关键参数。当最初没有动脉血时,静脉血气分析可能具有临床意义。

方法

24 头猪经历了渐进性正常血容量性血液稀释,随后进行渐进性出血,直至动物死亡。在每一步之后,从动脉和中心静脉血中测定碱剩余和乳酸水平。此外,通过 Zander 修正的 Van Slyke 方程计算碱剩余(BE(z))。连续变量以平均值 +/- SD 表示,并代表所有测量值(n = 195)。

结果

根据美国临床实验室标准化委员会(National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards)的动脉血标准,动脉血的碱剩余为 2.27 +/- 4.12,而中心静脉血为 2.48 +/- 4.33 mmol(-l)(P = 0.099),具有很强的相关性(r(2) = 0.960,P < 0.001)。与血液稀释相比,这些参数之间的差异标准差(SD-DIFBE)在出血期间没有增加(P = 0.355)。动脉血乳酸为 2.66 +/- 3.23,而中心静脉血乳酸为 2.71 +/- 2.80 mmol(-l)(P = 0.330),具有很强的相关性(r(2) = 0.983,P < 0.001)。SD-DIFLAC 在出血期间增加(P < 0.001)。中心静脉血的 BE(z)为 2.22 +/- 4.62 mmol(-l)(P = 0.006 与根据美国临床实验室标准化委员会的动脉碱剩余相比),具有很强的相关性(r(2) = 0.942,P < 0.001)。SD-DIFBE(z)/碱剩余在出血期间增加(P < 0.024)。

结论

在稳态条件下,中心静脉血气分析是动脉血碱剩余和乳酸的良好预测指标。然而,在出血期间,动脉和中心静脉乳酸之间的差异增加。Zander 对 Van Slyke 方程的修正并没有改善中心静脉和动脉碱剩余之间的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验