Suppr超能文献

失血性休克期间动脉血与静脉血气的差异

Arterial vs venous blood gas differences during hemorrhagic shock.

作者信息

Williams Kristopher Burton, Christmas Ashley Britton, Heniford Brant Todd, Sing Ronald Fong, Messick Joseph

机构信息

Kristopher Burton Williams, Ashley Britton Christmas, Brant Todd Heniford, Ronald Fong Sing, Joseph Messick, Department of Surgery, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28204, United States.

出版信息

World J Crit Care Med. 2014 May 4;3(2):55-60. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i2.55.

Abstract

AIM

To characterize differences of arterial (ABG) and venous (VBG) blood gas analysis in a rabbit model of hemorrhagic shock.

METHODS

Following baseline arterial and venous blood gas analysis, fifty anesthetized, ventilated New Zealand white rabbits were hemorrhaged to and maintained at a mean arterial pressure of 40 mmHg until a state of shock was obtained, as defined by arterial pH ≤ 7.2 and base deficit ≤ -15 mmol/L. Simultaneous ABG and VBG were obtained at 3 minute intervals. Comparisons of pH, base deficit, pCO2, and arteriovenous (a-v) differences were then made between ABG and VBG at baseline and shock states. Statistical analysis was applied where appropriate with a significance of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

All 50 animals were hemorrhaged to shock status and euthanized; no unexpected loss occurred. Significant differences were noted between baseline and shock states in blood gases for the following parameters: pH was significantly decreased in both arterial (7.39 ± 0.12 to 7.14 ± 0.18) and venous blood gases (7.35 ± 0.15 to 6.98 ± 0.26, P < 0.05), base deficit was significantly increased for arterial (-0.9 ± 3.9 mEq/L vs -17.8 ± 2.2 mEq/L) and venous blood gasses (-0.8 ± 3.8 mEq/L vs -15.3 ± 4.1 mEq/L, P < 0.05). pCO2 trends (baseline to shock) demonstrated a decrease in arterial blood (40.0 ± 9.1 mmHg vs 28.9 ± 7.1 mmHg) but an increase in venous blood (46.0 ± 10.1 mmHg vs 62.8 ± 15.3 mmHg), although these trends were non-significant. For calculated arteriovenous differences between baseline and shock states, only the pCO2 difference was shown to be significant during shock.

CONCLUSION

In this rabbit model, significant differences exist in blood gas measurements for arterial and venous blood after hemorrhagic shock. A widened pCO2 a-v difference during hemorrhage, reflective of poor tissue oxygenation, may be a better indicator of impending shock.

摘要

目的

在失血性休克兔模型中描述动脉血气分析(ABG)和静脉血气分析(VBG)的差异。

方法

在进行基线动脉和静脉血气分析后,将50只麻醉、通气的新西兰白兔放血,使其平均动脉压维持在40 mmHg,直至达到休克状态,休克定义为动脉pH≤7.2且碱缺失≤ -15 mmol/L。每隔3分钟同时采集ABG和VBG。然后比较基线和休克状态下ABG与VBG之间的pH、碱缺失、pCO₂和动静脉(a-v)差值。在适当情况下进行统计学分析,显著性水平为P < 0.05。

结果

所有50只动物均放血至休克状态并实施安乐死;未发生意外损失。以下参数的血气在基线和休克状态之间存在显著差异:动脉血pH显著降低(从7.39±0.12降至7.14±0.18),静脉血pH也显著降低(从7.35±0.15降至6.98±0.26,P < 0.05);动脉血碱缺失显著增加(从-0.9±3.9 mEq/L增至-17.8±2.2 mEq/L),静脉血碱缺失也显著增加(从-0.8±3.8 mEq/L增至-15.3±4.1 mEq/L,P < 0.05)。pCO₂趋势(从基线到休克)显示动脉血降低(从40.0±9.1 mmHg降至28.9±7.1 mmHg),而静脉血升高(从46.0±10.1 mmHg升至62.8±15.3 mmHg),尽管这些趋势无统计学意义。对于基线和休克状态之间计算得出的动静脉差值,仅休克期间的pCO₂差值具有显著性。

结论

在该兔模型中,失血性休克后动脉血和静脉血的血气测量存在显著差异。出血期间pCO₂动静脉差值增大反映组织氧合不良,可能是即将发生休克的更好指标。

相似文献

3
Reference intervals for venous blood gas measurement in adults.成人静脉血气测量的参考区间。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Dec 3;59(5):947-954. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1224. Print 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验