Chaudhary Ali, Drew Brian, Orr Robert Douglas, Farrokhyar Forough
McMaster University, Room MDCL 31131200, Main Street West, Hamilton ON L8N 3Z5.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):317-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b11d9f.
Retrospective study.
To analyze geriatric patients with Type II odontoid fractures treated either with rigid cervical orthosis (CO) or surgery (Odontoid Screw or Transarticular screw).
Our literature search did not yield any studies on the outcome of Type II odontoid fractures in geriatric population treated with the rigid CO. We therefore designed a study to analyze geriatric patients with Type II odontoid fractures treated with either rigid cervical collar or surgery.
This is a retrospective chart review of patients with Type II odontoid fractures between July 1998 and June 2006. Inclusion criteria consists of males and females of 70 years of age or older with Type II odontoid fractures who were treated with rigid cervical collar or surgery. Exclusion criteria were displacement >4 mm, posteriorly displaced fracture, neurologic compromise, multilevel cervical spine injury, and treatment in a halo vest. Medical comorbidities were assessed using the Modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics. Primary outcomes were mortality and fusion (union, stable nonunion, nonunion). Minimum of 3 months follow-up was acceptable.
One hundred eighty four odontoid fractures were identified in 8 years. Twenty patients met our inclusion criteria (9 treated in rigid collar and 11 treated surgically). Median follow-up was 5.5 months. Out of 20 patients, 4 patients died (1 treated in CO, 3 treated surgically). Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics index was highest in patient treated in CO. In the rigid collar group, 6 patients had union (66.6%), and 2 developed stable nonunion (22.2%); whereas in the surgically treated group, 7 patients had union (87.5%), and 1 patient developed nonunion (12.5%).
Patients treated nonoperatively in rigid collar seem to have an overall favorable outcome. A well-designed prospective study, to compare the outcomes of surgical intervention with nonsurgical management of Type II odontoid in elderly is recommended.
回顾性研究。
分析采用刚性颈椎矫形器(CO)或手术(齿突螺钉或经关节螺钉)治疗的老年II型齿突骨折患者。
我们的文献检索未发现关于采用刚性CO治疗老年人群II型齿突骨折结局的任何研究。因此,我们设计了一项研究来分析采用刚性颈托或手术治疗的老年II型齿突骨折患者。
这是一项对1998年7月至2006年6月期间II型齿突骨折患者的回顾性病历审查。纳入标准包括年龄在70岁及以上、患有II型齿突骨折且接受刚性颈托或手术治疗的男性和女性。排除标准为移位>4mm、骨折向后移位、神经功能受损、多节段颈椎损伤以及采用头环背心治疗。使用改良老年累积疾病评定量表评估合并症。主要结局为死亡率和融合情况(愈合、稳定不愈合、不愈合)。至少3个月的随访是可接受的。
8年间共识别出184例齿突骨折。20例患者符合我们的纳入标准(9例采用刚性颈托治疗,11例接受手术治疗)。中位随访时间为5.5个月。20例患者中,4例死亡(1例采用CO治疗,3例接受手术治疗)。采用CO治疗的患者老年累积疾病评定量表指数最高。在刚性颈托组中,6例患者愈合(66.6%),2例出现稳定不愈合(22.2%);而在手术治疗组中,7例患者愈合(87.5%),1例患者出现不愈合(12.5%)。
采用刚性颈托非手术治疗的患者似乎总体预后良好。建议进行一项设计良好的前瞻性研究,以比较老年II型齿突骨折手术干预与非手术治疗的结局。