Schär Ralph T, Wilson Jefferson R, Ivanov Marcel, Barbagallo Giuseppe, Petrova Yana, Reizinho Carla, Gandia González Maria Luisa, Tessitore Enrico, Maciejczak Andrzej, Gabrovsky Nikolay, Depreitre Bart, Shiban Ehab, Demetriades Andreas K, Ringel Florian
Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Brain Spine. 2025 Jun 14;5:104295. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104295. eCollection 2025.
Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population. The objective of this study was to determine the current treatment patterns of spine surgeons for geriatric patients (≥70 years) with type II odontoid fractures.
How much do treatment practices for type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population differ amongst spine surgeons?
The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) Spine Section distributed a 39-items web-based survey among spine surgeons between July 2024 and February 2025.
A total of 154 responses were collected from 119 neurosurgeons (77.8 %) and 34 orthopedic surgeons (22.2 %). Participants were predominantly from Europe (92.7 %), and 63.2 % have been in practice >10 years. Fracture displacement, comorbidities and age were the most influential factors for decision-making. For non-displaced fractures, 78.8 % of respondents recommended conservative treatment for patients aged 70-80 years, and 83.7 % for those aged 80-90 years. For displaced fractures, 70.9 % preferred surgery for patients aged 70-80 years, whereas this preference decreased to 47.9 % for those aged 80-90 years. Posterior C1-2 fixation was the most common technique for 67.3 % of respondents, and 48.3 % prescribe a collar postoperatively. 51.3 % routinely order CT imaging postoperatively to assess for bony fusion. For conservative treatment, 59.3 % prescribe an external orthosis for 3 months.
Our survey found both variability and consistency in treatment practices of geriatric type II odontoid fractures, reflecting the ongoing debate and lack of consensus in clinical decision-making.
关于老年人群II型齿状突骨折的最佳治疗方法存在争议。本研究的目的是确定脊柱外科医生对老年(≥70岁)II型齿状突骨折患者的当前治疗模式。
脊柱外科医生对老年人群II型齿状突骨折的治疗方法有多大差异?
欧洲神经外科学会(EANS)脊柱分会在2024年7月至2025年2月期间向脊柱外科医生开展了一项基于网络的39项调查。
共收集到154份回复,其中119名神经外科医生(77.8%)和34名骨科医生(22.2%)。参与者主要来自欧洲(92.7%),63.2%的人从业超过10年。骨折移位、合并症和年龄是决策的最有影响因素。对于无移位骨折,78.8%的受访者建议对70 - 80岁的患者进行保守治疗,80 - 90岁的患者为83.7%。对于移位骨折,70.9%的人倾向于对70 - 80岁的患者进行手术,而80 - 90岁的患者这一倾向降至47.9%。67.3%的受访者最常用的技术是C1 - 2后路固定,48.3%的人术后开具颈托。51.3%的人术后常规安排CT成像以评估骨融合情况。对于保守治疗,59.3%的人开具外部矫形器3个月。
我们的调查发现老年II型齿状突骨折的治疗方法既有变异性又有一致性,反映出临床决策中持续存在的争论和缺乏共识。