• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经前路螺钉固定治疗齿状突骨折后颈椎的活动范围。

Range of motion in the cervical spine after odontoid fracture treated with anterior screw fixation.

作者信息

Wolan-Nieroda Andżelina, Maciejczak Andrzej, Guzik Agnieszka, Przysada Grzegorz, Szeliga Ewa, Drużbicki Mariusz

机构信息

Medical Faculty, University of Rzeszów, Kopisto 2A Avenue, 35-959, Rzeszow, Poland.

Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszow, Warszawska 26 a, 35-205, Rzeszów, Poland.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 15;14(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1135-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-019-1135-8
PMID:30987654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6466774/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is believed that direct odontoid screw fixation preserves the physiological cervical range of motion following surgery. However, there are no clinical studies confirming the motion sparing value of this technique. This study aims to (1) to assess active cervical range of motion following types II and III odontoid fracture, successfully treated with anterior odontoid screw fixation, and (2) to examine the relationship between the range of motion of the head and duration of collar usage, neck pain, quality of life, and patients' age.

METHODS

The study involved 41 patients subjected to a procedure of direct osteosynthesis of the dens with lag screw. Following the operation all the patients had to wear a cervical collar to protect the osteosynthesis. The control group consisted of 41 individuals with no clinical diagnosis of any cervical spine disorders. The spinal motion was assessed using multi-cervical unit, taking into account bending/extension, left and right lateral flexion, and left and right axial rotation.

RESULTS

In the study group, spine mobility correlated with the duration of hard collar usage following the operation, with a longer duration corresponding to poorer spine mobility at the end of the treatment. Statistically significant correlation was observed in the case of extension (p < 0.021) and axial rotation (p < 0.007). In the study group, there was a negative correlation between the range of motion and the patients' age, i.e., the older the patient the poorer his/her spinal mobility (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Active cervical range of motion in patients following direct osteosynthesis of the dens, augmented with a hard collar, was significantly lower than in the control population, and it correlated negatively with the duration of collar usage, the patients' age, and intensity of spinal pain.

摘要

背景

人们认为齿突螺钉直接固定术可在术后保留颈椎的生理活动范围。然而,尚无临床研究证实该技术的运动保留价值。本研究旨在:(1)评估经前路齿突螺钉固定术成功治疗的Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型齿突骨折患者术后的颈椎主动活动范围;(2)研究头部活动范围与颈托使用时长、颈部疼痛、生活质量及患者年龄之间的关系。

方法

本研究纳入41例行齿突拉力螺钉直接骨合成术的患者。术后所有患者均需佩戴颈托以保护骨合成部位。对照组由41例无任何颈椎疾病临床诊断的个体组成。采用多节段颈椎单元评估脊柱活动度,包括前屈/后伸、左右侧屈以及左右轴向旋转。

结果

在研究组中,脊柱活动度与术后硬颈托使用时长相关,使用时长越长,治疗结束时脊柱活动度越差。在后伸(p < 0.021)和轴向旋转(p < 0.007)方面观察到具有统计学意义的相关性。在研究组中,活动范围与患者年龄呈负相关,即患者年龄越大,脊柱活动度越差(p < 0.001)。

结论

经齿突直接骨合成术并辅以硬颈托治疗的患者,其颈椎主动活动范围显著低于对照组人群,且与颈托使用时长、患者年龄及脊柱疼痛强度呈负相关。

相似文献

1
Range of motion in the cervical spine after odontoid fracture treated with anterior screw fixation.经前路螺钉固定治疗齿状突骨折后颈椎的活动范围。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 15;14(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1135-8.
2
The comparison of clinical outcome of fresh type II odontoid fracture treatment between anterior cannulated screws fixation and posterior instrumentation of C1-2 without fusion: a retrospective cohort study.新鲜Ⅱ型齿状突骨折治疗中空心加压螺钉前路固定与C1-2后路内固定不融合的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jan 8;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0702-0.
3
[Anterior osteosynthesis of odontoid fractures].[齿状突骨折的前路骨合成]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Oct;75(5):332-8.
4
Treatment algorithm for dens fractures: non-halo immobilization, anterior screw fixation, or posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation.寰枢椎骨折的治疗方案:非环形固定、前路螺钉固定或后路寰枢关节 C1-C2 固定。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):e144(1-6). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01616.
5
Posterior atlantoaxial fixation of osteoporotic odontoid fracture: biomechanical analysis of the Magerl versus harms techniques in a cadaver model.骨质疏松性齿状突骨折的寰枢后路固定:Magerl 与 Harms 技术在尸体模型中的生物力学分析。
Spine J. 2024 Aug;24(8):1510-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
6
Biomechanics of halo-vest and dens screw fixation for type II odontoid fracture.Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的头环背心与枢椎螺钉固定的生物力学
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 1;34(5):484-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195a65b.
7
A Technique for the In Vivo Study of Three-dimensional Cervical Segmental Motion Characteristics After Anterior Screw Fixation for Odontoid Process Fractures.寰椎齿状突骨折前路螺钉固定术后颈椎节段三维运动特征的体内研究技术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Apr 1;46(7):E433-E442. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003818.
8
Acute and long-term stability of atlantoaxial fixation methods: a biomechanical comparison of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar fixation in an intact and odontoid fracture model.寰枢椎固定方法的急性和长期稳定性:完整及齿状突骨折模型中椎弓根、椎弓根和椎板间固定的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):365-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181976aa9.
9
[Biomechanical study of different kinds of internal fixation for the typeⅠ Hangman fracture, type Ⅱ odontoid fracture and the C(2/3) disc injury: a finite-element analysis].Ⅰ型绞刑者骨折、Ⅱ型齿状突骨折及C(2/3)椎间盘损伤的不同内固定生物力学研究:有限元分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 21;98(31):2489-2495. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.31.008.
10
[Primary osteosynthesis of the odontoid process: a multicenter study].[齿突原发性骨合成:一项多中心研究]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2002;69(3):141-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Rotation Preserving Fixation for the Treatment of C1 Burst Fracture Combined With Type II Odontoid Fracture: 2 Case Reports and Literature Review.旋转保留固定治疗C1爆裂骨折合并II型齿状突骨折:2例报告及文献复习
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):617-625. doi: 10.14444/8646.
2
Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients with fracture of the axis vertebrae.脊柱轴骨折患者健康相关生活质量的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 24;11(1):19075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98476-w.
3
The biomechanical effect of preexisting different types of disc herniation in cervical hyperextension injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of cervical range of motion in patients after axis fracture.枢椎骨折患者颈椎活动范围的评估
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018 May-Jun;52(3):334-340. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
Nonoperative treatment of displaced type II odontoid peg fractures with a Philadelphia collar.使用费城颈托对移位的II型齿突骨折进行非手术治疗。
Orthopedics. 2012 Apr;35(4):e538-42. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120327-23.
3
[Biomechanical study on the posterior screw fixation in the lower cervical spine].下颈椎后路螺钉固定的生物力学研究
颈椎过伸伤中原发性不同类型椎间盘突出的生物力学效应。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 24;16(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02677-y.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Jun;24(6):530-3.
4
Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: an evidence-based narrative review of management.老年人 II 型齿状突骨折:基于证据的治疗叙述性综述。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Feb;20(2):195-204. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1507-6. Epub 2010 Sep 12.
5
Management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population: outcome of treatment in a rigid cervical orthosis.老年人群中II型齿状突骨折的治疗:刚性颈椎矫形器治疗的结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):317-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b11d9f.
6
Nonoperative management of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly.老年人II型齿状突骨折的非手术治疗
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 15;33(26):2881-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818d5407.
7
Evidence-based analysis of odontoid fracture management.齿突骨折治疗的循证分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2000 Jun 15;8(6):e1. doi: 10.3171/foc.2000.8.6.2.
8
Evidence-based management of type II odontoid fractures.II型齿状突骨折的循证管理
Clin Neurosurg. 1997;44:41-9.
9
Treatment protocol for fractures of the odontoid process.齿突骨折的治疗方案。
J Spinal Disord. 1996 Aug;9(4):267-76.
10
Nonoperative management of Types II and III odontoid fractures: the Philadelphia collar versus the halo vest.II型和III型齿突骨折的非手术治疗:费城颈托与 Halo 背心的比较。
Neurosurgery. 1996 Mar;38(3):450-6; discussion 456-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199603000-00006.