Suppr超能文献

功能性沟通训练前跨功能的指令评估

An Evaluation of Manding Across Functions Prior to Functional Communication Training.

作者信息

Schieltz Kelly M, Wacker David P, Harding Jay W, Berg Wendy K, Lee John F, Dalmau Yaniz C Padilla

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Dev Phys Disabil. 2010 Apr;22(2):131-147. doi: 10.1007/s10882-009-9181-5.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether destructive behavior and manding were maintained by the same social reinforcers. A summary of 10 participants that met criteria for differentiated functional analysis and mand analysis results were included in this study. All participants were preschool-aged children with developmental disabilities who engaged in destructive behavior. All procedures were conducted in the participants' homes by their parent with investigator coaching. Functional analyses (attention, escape, and tangible test conditions) of destructive behavior and manding were conducted within multielement designs and showed social functions. The functional analysis of destructive behavior and functional analysis of mands identified the same reinforcers for only 2 of the 10 participants. The analysis of mands identified a reinforcer that was not identified by the analysis of destructive behavior for 5 participants (over-identification), did not identify a reinforcer that was identified by the analysis of destructive behavior for 2 participants (under-identification), and identified mixed reinforcers (combination of over-identification and under-identification) for 1 participant. Results suggest that the analysis of destructive behavior and the analysis of mands identified different reinforcers and are not interchangeable.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估破坏性行为和要求是否由相同的社会强化物维持。本研究纳入了10名符合差异化功能分析标准的参与者总结以及要求分析结果。所有参与者均为有发育障碍的学龄前儿童,他们存在破坏性行为。所有程序均由家长在研究者的指导下在参与者家中进行。在多元素设计中对破坏性行为和要求进行了功能分析(注意力、逃避和实物测试条件),并显示出社会功能。破坏性行为的功能分析和要求的功能分析仅在10名参与者中的2名身上确定了相同的强化物。要求分析为5名参与者确定了破坏性行为分析未识别出的强化物(过度识别),2名参与者的要求分析未识别出破坏性行为分析所确定的强化物(识别不足),1名参与者的要求分析确定了混合强化物(过度识别和识别不足的组合)。结果表明,破坏性行为分析和要求分析确定了不同的强化物,且不可相互替代。

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of Manding Across Functions Prior to Functional Communication Training.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2010 Apr;22(2):131-147. doi: 10.1007/s10882-009-9181-5.
2
Evaluation of Mand-Reinforcer Relations Following Long-Term Functional Communication Training.
J Speech Lang Pathol Appl Behav Anal. 2008(2.4-3.1):25-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.-25.
3
An Evaluation of Conditional Manding Using a Four-Component Multiple Schedule.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2018 Oct 15;35(1):94-102. doi: 10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9. eCollection 2019 Apr.
4
Indirect Effects of Functional Communication Training on Non-Targeted Disruptive Behavior.
J Behav Educ. 2011 Mar;20(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s10864-011-9119-8.
6
Does teaching an omnibus mand preclude the development of specifying mands?
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jan;54(1):248-269. doi: 10.1002/jaba.784. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Treating destructive behavior reinforced by increased caregiver compliance with the participant's mands.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1494-1513. doi: 10.1002/jaba.674. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
8
On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):251-64; quiz 264-5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-251.
9
Analysis of Mand Selection across Different Stimulus Conditions.
Educ Treat Children. 2010 Feb 1;33(1):49-64. doi: 10.1353/etc.0.0086.
10
Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263.

引用本文的文献

1
AN EVALUATION OF RESURGENCE DURING FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING.
Psychol Rec. 2013 Jan;63(1):3-20. doi: 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.1.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
2
A Systematic Review of Caregiver-Implemented Functional Analyses.
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Jan 6;13(3):698-713. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00404-y. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Measuring Early Communication in Spanish Speaking Children: The Communication Complexity Scale in Peru.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2015;3(1):9-19. doi: 10.12970/2311-1917.2015.03.01.2.
5
Indirect Effects of Functional Communication Training on Non-Targeted Disruptive Behavior.
J Behav Educ. 2011 Mar;20(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s10864-011-9119-8.
6
An evaluation of persistence of treatment effects during long-term treatment of destructive behavior.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Sep;96(2):261-82. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-261.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional communication training: a review and practical guide.
Behav Anal Pract. 2008 Spring;1(1):16-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03391716.
3
A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):185-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.
4
An evaluation of resurgence during treatment with functional communication training.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):145-60. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-145.
5
Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training.
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):330-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
6
Utility of extinction-induced response variability for the selection of mands.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2008 Spring;41(1):15-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2008.41-15.
7
A methodology for assessing the functions of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Fall;38(3):303-16. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.106-04.
8
Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):295-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-295.
9
Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):73-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-73.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验