• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在功能性沟通训练期间对新颖要求的个体偏好的一种展示。

A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.

作者信息

Winborn-Kemmerer Lisa, Ringdahl Joel E, Wacker David P, Kitsukawa Kana

机构信息

University of Iowa, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):185-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185
PMID:19721740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2649840/
Abstract

Preference for mand topography was evaluated for 2 individuals with developmental disabilities who exhibited problem behavior. The results of a functional analysis showed that each participant's problem behavior was maintained by social reinforcement. Participants were taught two novel mand topographies for the same functional reinforcer, and each proved to be effective in reducing problem behavior. Finally, preference for mand topography was assessed within a concurrent-schedules design. Results indicated that functional communication training was an effective treatment, regardless of the mand used, and that each participant demonstrated a preference for one mand topography relative to the other.

摘要

对两名有问题行为的发育障碍个体的指令语形偏好进行了评估。功能分析结果表明,每个参与者的问题行为都由社会强化维持。针对相同的功能性强化物,对参与者进行了两种新的指令语形训练,且每种都被证明能有效减少问题行为。最后,在并发日程安排设计中评估了对指令语形的偏好。结果表明,无论使用哪种指令语形,功能性沟通训练都是一种有效的治疗方法,且每个参与者相对于另一种指令语形都表现出对一种指令语形的偏好。

相似文献

1
A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.在功能性沟通训练期间对新颖要求的个体偏好的一种展示。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):185-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.
2
Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training.评估一种预处理评估方法,以选择用于功能性沟通训练的下颌地形。
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;30(2):330-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
3
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.进一步研究影响对正强化与负强化偏好的因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05.
4
Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages.功能性沟通训练包的指令选择评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):295-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-295.
5
Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.针对幼儿严重行为问题的决策性治疗。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263.
6
Assessing Mand Topography Preference When Developing a Functional Communication Training Intervention.在开展功能性沟通训练干预时评估手势语地形偏好。
Behav Modif. 2018 May;42(3):364-381. doi: 10.1177/0145445517751437. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
7
Lag Schedules and Functional Communication Training: Persistence of Mands and Relapse of Problem Behavior.延迟计划表与功能性沟通训练:指令的持续性与问题行为的复发
Behav Modif. 2018 May;42(3):314-334. doi: 10.1177/0145445517741475. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
8
Evaluation of treatment integrity errors on mand acquisition.对下颌骨获取过程中治疗完整性错误的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):575-89. doi: 10.1002/jaba.238. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.对通过逃避维持的问题行为进行依从性治疗时正强化与负强化的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):563-74. doi: 10.1002/jaba.216. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Thinning Schedules of Reinforcement Following Functional Communication Training for Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analytic Review.功能性沟通训练后减少强化物对智障和发育障碍儿童的影响:一项荟萃分析研究。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Dec;49(12):4788-4806. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04191-x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Teaching Multiple Responses on Resurgence of Target Behavior and Persistence of Alternative Responding.教授多种反应对目标行为再现及替代反应持续性的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;15(8):1014. doi: 10.3390/bs15081014.
2
Communication Modality Preference and the Social Validity of Functional Communication and Mand Training.沟通方式偏好与功能性沟通及指令训练的社会效度
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2025 Jun;37(3):411-428. doi: 10.1007/s10882-024-09956-6. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review.智力和发育障碍个体对高科技与低科技选项的方式偏好评估:一项系统综述
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Jul 6;17(1):228-245. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00829-6. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Applied Behavior Analysis and the Abolitionist Neurodiversity Critique: An Ethical Analysis.应用行为分析与废奴主义神经多样性批判:一项伦理分析。
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Mar 2;16(4):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00780-6.
5
A Practitioner's Guide for Selecting Functional Communication Responses.选择功能性沟通反应的从业者指南。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Apr 12;16(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00705-9. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Sustaining behavior reduction by transitioning the topography of the functional communication response.通过改变功能性交流反应的拓扑结构来维持行为减少。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):1013-1031. doi: 10.1002/jaba.824. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
7
Further Demonstrations of Individual Preference among Mand Modalities during Functional Communication Training.功能性沟通训练中手势模态间个体偏好的进一步论证
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2016 Dec;28(6):905-917. doi: 10.1007/s10882-016-9518-9. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
8
Effects of response preference on resistance to change.反应偏好对改变阻力的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Jan;109(1):265-280. doi: 10.1002/jeab.308. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Assessing Acquisition of and Preference for Mand Topographies During Functional Communication Training.在功能性沟通训练期间评估对强制性语言形式的习得及偏好
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Aug 18;9(2):165-8. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0083-y. eCollection 2016 Jun.
10
RESURGENCE OF MANDS FOLLOWING FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING.功能性沟通训练后MANDS的再现
Rev Mex Anal Conducta. 2015 Sep;41(2):166-186.

本文引用的文献

1
On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.基于功能的干预措施中惩罚与消退成分的有效性及偏好性
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):51-65. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.6-04.
2
Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages.功能性沟通训练包的指令选择评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):295-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-295.
3
Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation.功能性沟通训练中的反应效率:努力程度对反应分配的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):73-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-73.
4
Functional communication training using assistive devices: recruiting natural communities of reinforcement.使用辅助设备的功能性沟通训练:招募自然强化群体。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;32(3):247-67. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-247.
5
The effects of noncontingent and contingent attention for self-injury, manding, and collateral responses.非连续性和连续性注意对自伤行为、提要求及附带反应的影响。
Behav Modif. 1998 Oct;22(4):474-84. doi: 10.1177/01454455980224002.
6
Evaluation and long-term treatment of aberrant behavior displayed by young children with disabilities.残疾幼儿异常行为的评估与长期治疗。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998 Aug;19(4):260-6. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199808000-00004.
7
Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages.评估客户对基于功能的治疗方案的偏好。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):459-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459.
8
Basic and applied research on choice responding.关于选择反应的基础研究与应用研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387-410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387.
9
Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems.针对幼儿严重行为问题的决策性治疗。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263-90. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263.
10
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.迈向自我伤害的功能分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197-209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.