Bisetti A, Grassi L, Scacciacillani E, Putti P
I Clinica Tisiopneumologica dell' Università, Ospedale 'Carlo Forlanini', Rome, Italy.
J Int Med Res. 1991;19 Suppl 1:36A-43A.
The clinical and bacteriological efficacy of a sulbactam/ampicillin combination was compared with piperacillin in a group of 50 patients suffering from acute or chronic lower respiratory infections: 26 were treated intravenously with piperacillin and 24 with sulbactam/ampicillin. The treatment was continued for at least 7 days for 24 patients at the dosage of 3 g sulbactam/ampicillin twice daily, for a further 24 patients at the dosage of 6 g piperacillin twice daily and for two patients at the dosage of 8 g piperacillin twice daily. In the patients treated with sulbactam/ampicillin, a rapid decrease in the fever with the concomitant reduction in cough and sputum production was observed, with cure in 18 cases and improvement in six. In the patients treated with piperacillin cure was observed in 14 cases and improvement in 12 cases. In both treatment groups safety was excellent. There was no significant difference, either in effectiveness or tolerability, between the two groups.
在一组50例急性或慢性下呼吸道感染患者中,比较了舒巴坦/氨苄西林组合与哌拉西林的临床和细菌学疗效:26例患者静脉注射哌拉西林,24例患者静脉注射舒巴坦/氨苄西林。24例患者以每日两次3g舒巴坦/氨苄西林的剂量持续治疗至少7天,另外24例患者以每日两次6g哌拉西林的剂量治疗,2例患者以每日两次8g哌拉西林的剂量治疗。在接受舒巴坦/氨苄西林治疗的患者中,观察到发热迅速下降,同时咳嗽和痰液分泌减少,18例治愈,6例好转。在接受哌拉西林治疗的患者中,14例治愈,12例好转。两个治疗组的安全性都很好。两组在有效性和耐受性方面均无显著差异。