Jauregui L, Minns P, Hageage G
Department of Medicine St. Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43608, USA.
Adv Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):62-71.
This was a randomized, prospective, parallel study of the efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam (2 g/1 g) and cefotaxime (2 g), administered intravenously every 6 hours, in 53 hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Thirty-four of the 36 patients treated with ampicillin/sulbactam and 16 of the 17 patients treated with cefotaxime were evaluable. Clinical and bacteriologic effectiveness did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = .828, P = .648, respectively). Of the ampicillin/sulbactam-treated patients, 21 (61.8%) were cured, 8 (23.5%) were improved, and 4 (11.8%) were treatment failures. In the cefotaxime group, 9 patients (56.3%) were cured, 4 (25%) were improved, and 2 (12.5%) were treatment failures. All primary pathogens were eradicated in 19 (55.9%) ampicillin/sulbactam-treated patients and partially eradicated in 7 (20.6%); in cefotaxime-treated patients, all primary pathogens were eradicated in 10 (62.5%) patients and partially eradicated in 2 (12.5%). Both study drugs were well tolerated, with the overall incidence of adverse events similarly low in the two groups.
这是一项随机、前瞻性、平行研究,旨在评估氨苄西林/舒巴坦(2克/1克)和头孢噻肟(2克)每6小时静脉给药一次,对53例住院下呼吸道感染患者的疗效和安全性。接受氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗的36例患者中有34例、接受头孢噻肟治疗的17例患者中有16例可进行评估。两组之间的临床和细菌学疗效无显著差异(分别为P = 0.828,P = 0.648)。在接受氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗的患者中,21例(61.8%)治愈,8例(23.5%)好转,4例(11.8%)治疗失败。在头孢噻肟组中,9例患者(56.3%)治愈,4例(25%)好转,2例(12.5%)治疗失败。在接受氨苄西林/舒巴坦治疗的患者中,19例(55.9%)所有主要病原体被根除,7例(20.6%)部分被根除;在接受头孢噻肟治疗的患者中,10例(62.5%)所有主要病原体被根除,2例(12.5%)部分被根除。两种研究药物耐受性良好,两组不良事件的总发生率同样较低。