• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳鼻喉科门诊的 microsuction 耳清洁:评估患者体验的问卷。

Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Singleton Hospital, Sketty, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Dec;267(12):1863-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1326-8. Epub 2010 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-010-1326-8
PMID:20607265
Abstract

Microsuction toilet of debris from the ear canal is a commonly performed procedure within the ENT outpatient clinic. This department has received two complaints from patients following microsuction aural toilet over the past year. These cases will be discussed. We wish to assess the frequency of side effects following aural microsuction in our department. A prospective questionnaire studied 164 patients undergoing aural microsuction over a 3 month period. From the total of 164 patients surveyed, only 74 (45%) did not report any adverse effects. Patients with mastoid cavities reported higher levels of vertigo when compared to those with normal ears (p < 0.001). A high proportion of patients have reported adverse side effects following aural microsuction. Medical staff should also be aware that certain patient subgroups are more prone to adverse effects. It would be appropriate to ensure that patients are counselled before suction takes place.

摘要

耳道微吸清除术是耳鼻喉科门诊中常见的操作。过去一年,该科室收到了两名患者在接受耳道微吸清除术后的投诉。我们将对这些病例进行讨论。我们希望评估在我们科室进行耳道微吸清除术后出现副作用的频率。一项前瞻性问卷调查了 164 名在 3 个月内接受耳道微吸清除术的患者。在总共调查的 164 名患者中,只有 74 名(45%)没有报告任何不良反应。与正常耳朵的患者相比,乳突腔的患者报告眩晕程度更高(p<0.001)。大量患者在接受耳道微吸清除术后出现了不良反应。医务人员还应注意到,某些特定患者群体更容易出现不良反应。在进行抽吸之前,应该对患者进行咨询,这是恰当的做法。

相似文献

1
Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience.耳鼻喉科门诊的 microsuction 耳清洁:评估患者体验的问卷。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Dec;267(12):1863-6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1326-8. Epub 2010 Jul 4.
2
Aural microsuction for wax impaction: survey of efficacy and patient perception.耳垢堵塞的耳部微吸除术:疗效及患者认知调查
J Laryngol Otol. 2014 Jul;128(7):621-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215114000796. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
3
Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.微吸耳腔冲洗时外耳道内产生的噪音水平及其对听力的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;34(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01841.x.
4
Aural microsuction.耳显微吸引术
BMJ. 2017 Jun 29;357:j2908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2908.
5
Audiovisual distraction reduces pain perception during aural microsuction.视听分心可减轻耳显微吸引术中的疼痛感知。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Jan;95(1):34-6. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13511609955535.
6
[Suction-generated noise levels during aural toilet].[耳部冲洗时吸力产生的噪音水平]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Feb;91(2):103-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295464. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
7
Vertigo following aural suction: can it be prevented?耳部吸引后眩晕:能否预防?
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988 Aug;13(4):285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb01133.x.
8
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study.评估全科医疗中微吸痰服务的患者满意度:一项比较研究。
BJGP Open. 2019 Jul 23;3(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101649. Print 2019 Jul.
9
Temporary threshold shift following ear canal microsuction.耳道微吸后暂时阈移。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Sep;59(9):713-718. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1746977. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
10
Aural microsuction: an analysis of post-procedure patient safety incidents.耳用微吸引术:术后患者安全事件分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):945-947. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03540-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
2
Nystagmus and Vertigo During Aural Toilet Using Microsuction.使用微吸法进行耳部清理时的眼球震颤和眩晕
Audiol Res. 2025 Mar 19;15(2):33. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15020033.
3
Aural microsuction: an analysis of post-procedure patient safety incidents.耳用微吸引术:术后患者安全事件分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Acoustic trauma of the coch ea from ear surgery.
Laryngoscope. 1960 Apr;70:479-505. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196004000-00011.
2
Drill- and suction-generated noise in mastoid surgery.乳突手术中钻孔和吸引产生的噪音。
Arch Otolaryngol. 1980 Feb;106(2):92-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1980.00790260024008.
3
Suction-generated noise in the external meatus and sensorineural hearing loss.
J Laryngol Otol. 1982 Sep;96(9):857-63. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100093191.
4
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Apr;193(2):945-947. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03540-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub2.
5
Treatment of impacted ear wax: a case for increased community-based microsuction.耵聍栓塞的治疗:增加基于社区的微吸除术的理由
BJGP Open. 2020 Jun 23;4(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101064. Print 2020 Jun.
6
Assessing patient satisfaction with a microsuction service in general practice: a comparative study.评估全科医疗中微吸痰服务的患者满意度:一项比较研究。
BJGP Open. 2019 Jul 23;3(2). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101649. Print 2019 Jul.
[Movement of the stapes footplate in drilling injuries of the ear ossicle chain].
[镫骨足板在听骨链钻孔损伤中的运动]
Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1972;202(2):559-63.
5
Warm air for prevention of vertigo.用于预防眩晕的暖空气。
Laryngoscope. 1988 Jun;98(6 Pt 1):687. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198806000-00023.
6
Vertigo following aural suction: can it be prevented?耳部吸引后眩晕:能否预防?
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988 Aug;13(4):285-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb01133.x.
7
Variables affecting the drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery.
Acta Otolaryngol. 1977 Sep-Oct;84(3-4):252-9. doi: 10.3109/00016487709123964.