Department of Biology, Syracuse University, New York 13244, USA.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):249-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00147.x.
Sperm are often considered to be individuals, in part because of their unique genetic identities produced as a result of synapsis during meiosis, and in part due to their unique ecology, being ejected away from the soma to continue their existence in a foreign environment. Selection at the level of individual sperm has been suggested to explain the evolution of two enigmatic sperm phenotypes: sperm heteromorphism, where more than one type of sperm is produced by a male, and sperm conjugation, where multiple sperm join together for motility and transport through the female reproductive tract before dissociation prior to fertilization. In sperm heteromorphic species, only one of the sperm morphs typically participates in fertilization, with the non-fertilizing "parasperm" being interpreted as reproductive altruists. Likewise, in species with sperm conjugation, high levels of sperm mortality have been suggested to be required for conjugate break-up and this has been considered evidence of kin-selected altruism. However, it is unclear if sperm possess the heritable variation in fitness (i.e. are individuals) required for the evolution of cooperation. We investigate the question of sperm individuality by focusing on how sperm morphology is determined and how sperm conjugates are formed. Concentrating on sperm conjugation, we discuss functional hypotheses for the evolutionary maintenance of this remarkable trait. Additionally, we speculate on the potential origins of sperm heteromorphism and conjugation, and explore the diversification and losses of these traits once they have arisen in a lineage. We find current evidence insufficient to support the concept of sperm control over their form or function. Thus, without additional evidence of haploid selection (i.e. sperm phenotypes that reflect their haploid genome and result in heritable differences in fitness), sperm heteromorphism and conjugation should be interpreted not as cooperation but rather as traits selected at the level of the male, much like other ejaculatory traits such as accessory gland proteins and ejaculate size.
精子通常被认为是个体,部分原因是它们在减数分裂过程中由于联会而产生独特的遗传身份,部分原因是它们独特的生态,从体细胞中射出,在外部环境中继续生存。个体精子的选择被认为可以解释两种神秘的精子表型的进化:精子异型性,即雄性产生一种以上类型的精子,以及精子结合,即多个精子在雌性生殖道中一起运动和运输,然后在受精前分离。在具有精子异型性的物种中,只有一种精子形态通常参与受精,非受精的“副精子”被解释为生殖利他主义者。同样,在具有精子结合的物种中,高水平的精子死亡率被认为是结合体解体所必需的,这被认为是亲属选择利他主义的证据。然而,目前尚不清楚精子是否具有合作进化所需的可遗传适应性变异(即个体)。我们通过关注精子形态的决定方式以及精子结合体的形成方式来研究精子个体性的问题。我们专注于精子结合,讨论了这种显著特征的进化维持的功能假说。此外,我们推测了精子异型性和结合的潜在起源,并探讨了一旦在一个谱系中出现这些特征,它们的多样化和丧失。我们发现,目前的证据不足以支持精子控制其形态或功能的概念。因此,在没有关于单倍体选择(即反映其单倍体基因组并导致适应性可遗传差异的精子表型)的额外证据的情况下,精子异型性和结合不应被解释为合作,而应被解释为类似于其他射精特征,如附属腺蛋白和精液量的雄性选择的特征。