Centre for Tropical Diseases, S, Cuore Hospital, 37024 Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Malar J. 2010 Jul 7;9:192. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-192.
Malaria management policies currently recommend that the treatment should only be administered after laboratory confirmation. Where microscopy is not available, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the usual alternative. Conclusive evidence is still lacking on the safety of a test-based strategy for children. Moreover, no formal attempt has been made to estimate RDTs accuracy on malaria-attributable fever. This study aims at estimating the accuracy of a RDT for the diagnosis of both malaria infection and malaria - attributable fever, in a region of Burkina Faso with a typically seasonal malaria transmission pattern.
Cross-sectional study.
all patients aged > 6 months consulting during the study periods. Gold standard for the diagnosis of malaria infection was microscopy. Gold standard for malaria-attributable fever was the number of fevers attributable to malaria, estimated by comparing parasite densities of febrile versus non-febrile subjects.
severe clinical condition needing urgent care.
In the dry season, 186/852 patients with fever (22%) and 213/1,382 patients without fever (15%) had a Plasmodium falciparum infection. In the rainy season, this proportion was 841/1,317 (64%) and 623/1,669 (37%), respectively. The attributable fraction of fever to malaria was 11% and 69%, respectively. The RDT was positive in 113/400 (28.3%) fever cases in the dry season, and in 443/650 (68.2%) in the rainy season. In the dry season, the RDT sensitivity and specificity for malaria infection were 86% and 90% respectively. In the rainy season they were 94% and 78% respectively. In the dry season, the RDT sensitivity and specificity for malaria-attributable fever were 94% and 75%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 9% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.8%. In the rainy season the test sensitivity for malaria-attributable fever was 97% and specificity was 55%. The PPV ranged from 38% for adults to 82% for infants, while the NPV ranged from 84% for infants to over 99% for adults.
In the dry season the RDT has a low positive predictive value, but a very high negative predictive value for malaria-attributable fever. In the rainy season the negative test safely excludes malaria in adults but not in children.
疟疾管理政策目前建议仅在实验室确认后进行治疗。在无法进行显微镜检查的情况下,快速诊断检测(RDT)通常是替代方法。对于基于检测的儿童疟疾治疗策略的安全性,仍然缺乏确凿的证据。此外,尚未正式尝试估计 RDT 对疟疾引起的发热的准确性。本研究旨在评估布基纳法索一个具有典型季节性疟疾传播模式地区的 RDT 对疟疾感染和疟疾引起的发热的诊断准确性。
横断面研究。
所有在研究期间就诊的年龄大于 6 个月的患者。疟疾感染的金标准是显微镜检查。疟疾引起的发热的金标准是通过比较发热和非发热患者的寄生虫密度来估计疟疾引起的发热数量。
需要紧急护理的严重临床状况。
在旱季,186/852 例发热患者(22%)和 213/1382 例无发热患者(15%)感染了恶性疟原虫。在雨季,这一比例分别为 841/1317(64%)和 623/1669(37%)。发热归因于疟疾的比例分别为 11%和 69%。在旱季,RDT 在 400 例发热病例中的阳性率为 28.3%,在雨季为 650 例中的阳性率为 68.2%。在旱季,RDT 对疟疾感染的敏感性和特异性分别为 86%和 90%。在雨季,它们分别为 94%和 78%。在旱季,RDT 对疟疾引起的发热的敏感性和特异性分别为 94%和 75%,阳性预测值(PPV)为 9%,阴性预测值(NPV)为 99.8%。在雨季,该检测对疟疾引起的发热的敏感性为 97%,特异性为 55%。PPV 范围为成人 38%至婴儿 82%,NPV 范围为婴儿 84%至成人 99%以上。
在旱季,RDT 对疟疾引起的发热的阳性预测值较低,但阴性预测值非常高。在雨季,阴性检测可安全排除成人疟疾,但不能排除儿童疟疾。