Hall Toby, Briffa Kathy, Hopper Diana, Robinson Kim
School of Physiotherapy, Curtin Innovation Health Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Hayman Road, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia.
Man Ther. 2010 Dec;15(6):542-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
This study investigated the reliability of manual examination procedures and the frequency that each or multiple segments in the upper cervical spine above the C4 vertebra were the dominant source of pain in subjects with cervicogenic headache (CGH). Eighty subjects were evaluated, 60 with CGH (39 females, mean age 33 years) and arbitrarily a further 20 asymptomatic subjects (13 females, mean age 34 years) included to reduce examiner bias, but subsequently omitted from data analysis. Two experienced physiotherapists examined on the same day each subject with standard manual examination procedures, independently rating each segment in the upper cervical spine above the C4 vertebra for involvement. Examiners were blind to each other's findings and the subject's clinical status. Standard and adjusted Kappa coefficients were calculated for each segment in symptomatic subjects only. Chi-squared analysis for goodness of fit was used to identify the segment that was most frequently determined the predominant symptomatic segment. Manual examination above the C4 vertebra showed good reliability. The C1/2 segment was most commonly symptomatic, with a positive finding at this segment in 63% of cases. The high frequency of C1/2 involvement in CGH highlights the importance of examination and treatment procedures for this motion segment.
本研究调查了手法检查程序的可靠性,以及在颈源性头痛(CGH)患者中,C4椎体以上上颈椎单个节段或多个节段作为主要疼痛来源的频率。共评估了80名受试者,其中60名患有CGH(39名女性,平均年龄33岁),另外任意选取20名无症状受试者(13名女性,平均年龄34岁)以减少检查者偏倚,但随后从数据分析中剔除。两名经验丰富的物理治疗师在同一天使用标准手法检查程序对每名受试者进行检查,独立评定C4椎体以上上颈椎各节段的受累情况。检查者对彼此的检查结果及受试者的临床状态均不知情。仅对有症状的受试者各节段计算标准kappa系数和校正kappa系数。采用拟合优度的卡方分析来确定最常被判定为主要症状节段的节段。C4椎体以上的手法检查显示出良好的可靠性。C1/2节段最常出现症状,该节段在63%的病例中呈阳性发现。CGH患者中C1/2节段受累频率较高,凸显了针对该活动节段检查和治疗程序的重要性。