Université François Rabelais, INSERM U966, Faculté de Médecine, 10 Bd. Tonnellé, Tours, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3281-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00303-10. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
There is no reliable and simple diagnostic marker available to diagnose recent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. It has been shown that the avidity of specific IgG antibody is low in primary viral infection and increases with time. We report the development of an anti-HCV avidity assay derived from a commercially available test. A panel of 117 sera was first examined for IgG avidity. It was composed of samples from patients with recent (group 1, n = 14), chronic (group 2, n = 70), and resolved (group 3, n = 33) HCV infections. Avidity index (AI) values observed in recently infected patients were significantly lower (12.0% +/- 9.2% [mean +/- standard deviation]) than those found in chronic carriers (83.1% +/- 15.2%). Using a threshold of 43.0%, this assay distinguished between groups 1 and 2 with very high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (100%). For group 3, a broader distribution of the AI values was observed (54.8% +/- 27.3%), suggesting that this index would not be useful in HCV RNA-negative patients. Blind validation of the test was carried out with a panel of 36 serum samples from 17 HCV seroconverters. The assay described here is a useful tool to distinguish recent from chronic infection in HCV-viremic patients.
目前尚无可靠且简便的诊断标志物可用于诊断近期丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染。已证实,在初次病毒感染时,特异性 IgG 抗体的亲合力较低,且随时间推移而增加。我们报告了一种源自市售检测试剂的 HCV 抗体亲和力检测方法的建立。首先,我们用该方法检测了由 117 份血清组成的panel,这些血清样本分别来自近期(第 1 组,n = 14)、慢性(第 2 组,n = 70)和已清除(第 3 组,n = 33)HCV 感染者。新近感染患者的亲和力指数(AI)值显著较低(12.0% +/- 9.2% [均值 +/- 标准差]),明显低于慢性感染者(83.1% +/- 15.2%)。以 43.0%为界值,该检测方法对第 1 组和第 2 组的区分具有很高的敏感性(98%)和特异性(100%)。对于第 3 组,AI 值的分布范围较宽(54.8% +/- 27.3%),提示该指标在 HCV RNA 阴性患者中可能无应用价值。我们用 17 例 HCV 血清转换患者的 36 份血清样本对该检测方法进行了盲法验证。该方法可用于区分 HCV 病毒血症患者的近期感染与慢性感染,是一种有用的工具。