West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
J Med Virol. 2018 Jan;90(1):120-130. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24919. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Accurate detection of incident hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is required to target and evaluate public health interventions, but acute infection is largely asymptomatic and difficult to detect using traditional methods. Our aim was to evaluate a previously developed HCV avidity assay to distinguish acute from chronic HCV infection. Plasma samples collected from recent seroconversion subjects in two large Australian cohorts were tested using the avidity assay, and the avidity index (AI) was calculated. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with low/high AI were compared via logistic regression. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay for recent infection and the mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) were estimated stratified by HCV genotype. Avidity was assessed in 567 samples (from 215 participants), including 304 with viraemia (defined as ≥250 IU/mL). An inverse relationship between AI and infection duration was found in viraemic samples only. The adjusted odds of a low AI (<30%) decreased with infection duration (odds ratio [OR] per week of 0.93; 95% CI:0.89-0.97), and were lower for G1 compared with G3 samples (OR = 0.14; 95% CI:0.05-0.39). Defining recent infection as <26 weeks, sensitivity (at AI cut-off of 20%) was estimated at 48% (95% CI:39-56%), 36% (95% CI:20-52%), and 65% (95% CI:54-75%) and MDRI was 116, 83, and 152 days for all genotypes, G1, and G3, respectively. Specificity (≥52 weeks infection duration, all genotypes) was 96% (95% CI:90-98%). HCV avidity testing has utility for detecting recent HCV infection in patients, and for assessing progress in reaching incidence targets for eliminating transmission, but variation in assay performance across genotype should be recognized.
准确检测丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 感染事件对于确定和评估公共卫生干预措施至关重要,但急性感染在很大程度上无症状,并且难以使用传统方法检测。我们的目的是评估先前开发的 HCV 亲和力测定法,以区分急性和慢性 HCV 感染。使用亲和力测定法检测来自澳大利亚两个大型队列中最近发生血清转换的受试者的血浆样本,并计算亲和力指数 (AI)。通过逻辑回归比较 AI 低值/高值患者的人口统计学和临床特征。根据 HCV 基因型分层,估计检测方法对近期感染的敏感性和特异性以及最近感染的平均持续时间 (MDRI)。在病毒血症样本(定义为≥250IU/mL)中评估了 567 个样本(来自 215 名参与者)的亲和力。仅在病毒血症样本中发现 AI 与感染持续时间呈负相关。低 AI(<30%)的调整后比值比(OR)随感染持续时间而降低(每周增加 0.93;95%CI:0.89-0.97),G1 与 G3 样本相比,OR 较低(OR=0.14;95%CI:0.05-0.39)。将近期感染定义为<26 周时,AI 截断值为 20%时的敏感性估计值为 48%(95%CI:39-56%)、36%(95%CI:20-52%)和 65%(95%CI:54-75%),所有基因型、G1 和 G3 的 MDRI 分别为 116、83 和 152 天。特异性(≥52 周感染持续时间,所有基因型)为 96%(95%CI:90-98%)。HCV 亲和力检测对检测患者的近期 HCV 感染以及评估消除传播发病率目标的进展具有实用价值,但应认识到检测方法在不同基因型之间的性能差异。