Mola Glen D L, Kuk Joseph M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Papua New Guinea School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Papua New Guinea.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;50(3):246-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01166.x.
Most previous trials of vacuum-assisted delivery have been in settings with high rates of instrumental vaginal delivery (8-12%) and high rates of failure to deliver with the intended instrument (20-30%). Over the past 20 years, vacuum-assisted delivery rates at the Port Moresby General Hospital have been 3-4% with failure rates of <3%.
The objective is to compare the failure rates of two vacuum extractor instruments, the Vacca Re-Usable Omnicup and the Bird Vacuum delivery system (anterior and posterior cups).
Port Moresby General national referral and teaching Hospital (PMGH), Papua New Guinea.
Two hundred consecutive women requiring assisted delivery, June-December, 2007.
When a woman required an assisted delivery, she was randomised into either the Vacca Re-Usable Omnicup (Clinical Innovations Inc.) or Bird anterior or posterior metal cup (depending upon the position of the vertex). One hundred women were randomised to each vacuum device. Statistical analysis was on 'an intention-to-treat' basis.
The main outcome measure was the successful completion of the delivery with the allocated instrument. Secondary outcomes were maternal trauma (episiotomy and trauma to the maternal genital tract), significant scalp trauma (sub-galeal haemorrhage or serious abrasion) and fetal and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score less than seven at 5 minutes, days spent in the Special Care Nursery and neonatal death).
Failure rates for both Omnicup (2/100) and Bird metal cups (6/100) were not statistically different (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99-1.12; P = 0.17). Rates of maternal trauma and fetal scalp trauma were similar in both groups.
Both the Vacca re-useable Omnicup and the Bird metal cups are very effective instruments to achieve successful assisted delivery and equally so. Failures and problems were associated with not applying the vacuum cup to the flexion point on the fetal scalp and the mechanical faults with vacuum equipment devices.
以往大多数真空辅助分娩试验是在器械阴道分娩率较高(8%-12%)且预期器械分娩失败率较高(20%-30%)的环境中进行的。在过去20年里,莫尔斯比港总医院的真空辅助分娩率为3%-4%,失败率低于3%。
比较两种真空吸引器器械——可重复使用的Vacca Omnicup和Bird真空分娩系统(前后杯)的失败率。
巴布亚新几内亚莫尔斯比港总医院国家转诊和教学医院(PMGH)。
2007年6月至12月连续200名需要辅助分娩的妇女。
当一名妇女需要辅助分娩时,她被随机分为使用可重复使用的Vacca Omnicup(Clinical Innovations Inc.)或Bird前后金属杯(根据胎头位置)。每种真空设备随机分配100名妇女。统计分析采用“意向性分析”原则。
主要观察指标是使用分配的器械成功完成分娩。次要观察指标包括产妇创伤(会阴切开术和产妇生殖道创伤)、严重头皮创伤(帽状腱膜下出血或严重擦伤)以及胎儿和新生儿结局(5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分、在特殊护理病房的住院天数和新生儿死亡)。
Omnicup(2/100)和Bird金属杯(6/100)的失败率无统计学差异(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.99-1.12;P = 0.17)。两组产妇创伤和胎儿头皮创伤发生率相似。
可重复使用的Vacca Omnicup和Bird金属杯都是实现成功辅助分娩的非常有效的器械,效果相当。失败和问题与未将真空杯应用于胎儿头皮的屈曲点以及真空设备的机械故障有关。