Suppr超能文献

一项关于两种真空辅助分娩器械(可重复使用的Vacca全功能杯和Bird前后杯)的随机对照试验,以比较失败率、安全性和使用效果。

A randomised controlled trial of two instruments for vacuum-assisted delivery (Vacca Re-Usable OmniCup and the Bird anterior and posterior cups) to compare failure rates, safety and use effectiveness.

作者信息

Mola Glen D L, Kuk Joseph M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Papua New Guinea School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Papua New Guinea.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;50(3):246-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01166.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most previous trials of vacuum-assisted delivery have been in settings with high rates of instrumental vaginal delivery (8-12%) and high rates of failure to deliver with the intended instrument (20-30%). Over the past 20 years, vacuum-assisted delivery rates at the Port Moresby General Hospital have been 3-4% with failure rates of <3%.

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to compare the failure rates of two vacuum extractor instruments, the Vacca Re-Usable Omnicup and the Bird Vacuum delivery system (anterior and posterior cups).

SETTING

Port Moresby General national referral and teaching Hospital (PMGH), Papua New Guinea.

POPULATION

Two hundred consecutive women requiring assisted delivery, June-December, 2007.

METHODS

When a woman required an assisted delivery, she was randomised into either the Vacca Re-Usable Omnicup (Clinical Innovations Inc.) or Bird anterior or posterior metal cup (depending upon the position of the vertex). One hundred women were randomised to each vacuum device. Statistical analysis was on 'an intention-to-treat' basis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was the successful completion of the delivery with the allocated instrument. Secondary outcomes were maternal trauma (episiotomy and trauma to the maternal genital tract), significant scalp trauma (sub-galeal haemorrhage or serious abrasion) and fetal and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score less than seven at 5 minutes, days spent in the Special Care Nursery and neonatal death).

RESULTS

Failure rates for both Omnicup (2/100) and Bird metal cups (6/100) were not statistically different (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99-1.12; P = 0.17). Rates of maternal trauma and fetal scalp trauma were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both the Vacca re-useable Omnicup and the Bird metal cups are very effective instruments to achieve successful assisted delivery and equally so. Failures and problems were associated with not applying the vacuum cup to the flexion point on the fetal scalp and the mechanical faults with vacuum equipment devices.

摘要

背景

以往大多数真空辅助分娩试验是在器械阴道分娩率较高(8%-12%)且预期器械分娩失败率较高(20%-30%)的环境中进行的。在过去20年里,莫尔斯比港总医院的真空辅助分娩率为3%-4%,失败率低于3%。

目的

比较两种真空吸引器器械——可重复使用的Vacca Omnicup和Bird真空分娩系统(前后杯)的失败率。

地点

巴布亚新几内亚莫尔斯比港总医院国家转诊和教学医院(PMGH)。

研究对象

2007年6月至12月连续200名需要辅助分娩的妇女。

方法

当一名妇女需要辅助分娩时,她被随机分为使用可重复使用的Vacca Omnicup(Clinical Innovations Inc.)或Bird前后金属杯(根据胎头位置)。每种真空设备随机分配100名妇女。统计分析采用“意向性分析”原则。

主要观察指标

主要观察指标是使用分配的器械成功完成分娩。次要观察指标包括产妇创伤(会阴切开术和产妇生殖道创伤)、严重头皮创伤(帽状腱膜下出血或严重擦伤)以及胎儿和新生儿结局(5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分、在特殊护理病房的住院天数和新生儿死亡)。

结果

Omnicup(2/100)和Bird金属杯(6/100)的失败率无统计学差异(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.99-1.12;P = 0.17)。两组产妇创伤和胎儿头皮创伤发生率相似。

结论

可重复使用的Vacca Omnicup和Bird金属杯都是实现成功辅助分娩的非常有效的器械,效果相当。失败和问题与未将真空杯应用于胎儿头皮的屈曲点以及真空设备的机械故障有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验