• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚柔佛州一家三级医院观察到的药物皮肤不良反应。

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Int J Dermatol. 2010 Jul;49(7):834-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04481.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04481.x
PMID:20618508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions are most commonly cutaneous in nature. Patterns of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their causative drugs vary among the different populations previously studied.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to determine the clinical pattern of drug eruptions and the common drugs implicated, particularly in severe cutaneous ADRs in our population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was done by analyzing the database established for all adverse cutaneous drug reactions seen from January 2001 until December 2008.

RESULTS

A total of 281 cutaneous ADRs were seen in 280 patients. The most common reaction pattern was maculopapular eruption (111 cases, 39.5%) followed by Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS: 79 cases, 28.1%), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS: 19 cases, 6.8%), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN: 16 cases, 5.7 %), urticaria/angioedema (15 cases, 5.3%) and fixed drug eruptions (15 cases, 5.3%). Antibiotics (38.8%) and anticonvulsants (23.8%) accounted for 62.6% of the 281 cutaneous ADRs seen. Allopurinol was implicated in 39 (13.9%), carbamazepine in 29 (10.3%), phenytoin in 27 (9.6%) and cotrimoxazole in 26 (9.3%) cases. Carbamazepine, allopurinol and cotrimoxazole were the three main causative drugs of SJS/TEN accounting for 24.0%, 18.8% and 12.5% respectively of the 96 cases seen whereas DRESS was mainly caused by allopurinol (10 cases, 52.6%) and phenytoin (3 cases, 15.8%).

DISCUSSION

The reaction patterns and drugs causing cutaneous ADRs in our population are similar to those seen in other countries although we have a much higher proportion of severe cutaneous ADRs probably due to referral bias, different prescribing habit and a higher prevalence of HLA-B1502 and HLA-B5801 which are genetic markers for carbamazepine-induced SJS/TEN and allopurinol-induced SJS/TEN/DRESS respectively.

CONCLUSION

The most common reaction pattern seen in our study population was maculopapular eruptions. Antibiotics, anticonvulsants and NSAIDs were the most frequently implicated drug groups. Carbamazepine and allopurinol were the two main causative drugs of severe ADRs in our population.

摘要

背景

药物不良反应最常见的是皮肤类型。以前研究的不同人群中,皮肤不良反应(ADR)的模式及其致病药物各不相同。

目的

我们的目的是确定药物疹的临床模式和常见的致病药物,特别是在我们人群中的严重皮肤 ADR 中。

材料和方法

这项研究是通过分析从 2001 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间所有观察到的不良皮肤药物反应的数据库进行的。

结果

在 280 名患者中观察到 281 例皮肤 ADR。最常见的反应模式是斑丘疹疹(111 例,39.5%),其次是 Stevens-Johnson 综合征(SJS:79 例,28.1%),药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS:19 例,6.8%),中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN:16 例,5.7%),荨麻疹/血管性水肿(15 例,5.3%)和固定性药物疹(15 例,5.3%)。抗生素(38.8%)和抗惊厥药(23.8%)占 281 例皮肤 ADR 的 62.6%。别嘌呤醇(39 例,13.9%)、卡马西平(29 例,10.3%)、苯妥英(27 例,9.6%)和复方磺胺甲噁唑(26 例,9.3%)是引起 281 例皮肤 ADR 的主要药物。卡马西平、别嘌呤醇和复方磺胺甲噁唑是 SJS/TEN 的三种主要致病药物,分别占 96 例 SJS/TEN 中的 24.0%、18.8%和 12.5%,而 DRESS 主要由别嘌呤醇(10 例,52.6%)和苯妥英(3 例,15.8%)引起。

讨论

我们人群中引起皮肤 ADR 的反应模式和药物与其他国家相似,尽管我们有更高比例的严重皮肤 ADR,这可能是由于转诊偏见、不同的处方习惯以及 HLA-B1502 和 HLA-B5801 的患病率较高,HLA-B1502 和 HLA-B5801 分别是卡马西平引起的 SJS/TEN 和别嘌呤醇引起的 SJS/TEN/DRESS 的遗传标志物。

结论

在我们的研究人群中,最常见的反应模式是斑丘疹疹。抗生素、抗惊厥药和 NSAIDs 是最常涉及的药物组。卡马西平和别嘌呤醇是我们人群中严重 ADR 的两种主要致病药物。

相似文献

1
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia.马来西亚柔佛州一家三级医院观察到的药物皮肤不良反应。
Int J Dermatol. 2010 Jul;49(7):834-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04481.x.
2
An epidemiological and clinical analysis of cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia.马来西亚柔佛州一家 tertiary 医院的皮肤药物不良反应的流行病学和临床分析。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2012 Nov-Dec;78(6):734-9. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.102367.
3
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: clinical pattern and causative agents--a 6 year series from Chandigarh, India.皮肤药物不良反应:临床模式及致病因素——来自印度昌迪加尔的6年系列研究
J Postgrad Med. 2001 Apr-Jun;47(2):95-9.
4
A cross-sectional study of cutaneous drug reactions in a private dental college and government medical college in eastern India.印度东部一所私立牙科学院和一所政府医学院皮肤药物反应的横断面研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2012 Apr-Jun;15(2):194-8. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.97317.
5
Profile and pattern of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in a general hospital in Singapore: treatment outcomes.新加坡一家综合医院中 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的特征和模式:治疗结果。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2012 Jan;92(1):62-6. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1169.
6
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a 9-year study from a South Indian Hospital.皮肤药物不良反应:来自印度南部一家医院的9年研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):567-70. doi: 10.1002/pds.1105.
7
Epidemiological study of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a city district of China.中国某城区严重皮肤药物不良反应的流行病学研究
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006 Sep;31(5):642-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02185.x.
8
Adverse Skin Reactions with Antiepileptic Drugs Using Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database, 2008-2017.2008-2017 年韩国不良事件报告系统数据库中抗癫痫药物的皮肤不良反应。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Feb 3;35(4):e17. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e17.
9
Epidemiology of cutaneous adverse drug reactions.皮肤药物不良反应的流行病学
Chem Immunol Allergy. 2012;97:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000335612. Epub 2012 May 3.
10
A 10-years retrospective study on Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCARs) in a tertiary hospital in Penang, Malaysia.马来西亚槟城一家三级医院关于严重皮肤不良反应(SCARs)的10年回顾性研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2018 Apr;73(2):73-77.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2022 Jun 30;35(2):116-124.
2
Prevalence of Clinical Spectrum of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients Presenting at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院就诊患者中皮肤药物不良反应临床谱的患病率
Cureus. 2021 Apr 19;13(4):e14568. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14568.
3
An inventory of medicinal products causing skin rash: Clinical and regulatory lessons.引起皮疹的药品清单:临床及监管方面的经验教训
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Dec;18(6):5061-5071. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7837. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Causative drugs for drug-induced cutaneous reactions in central China: a 608-case analysis.中国中部地区药物性皮肤反应的致病药物:608例病例分析
An Bras Dermatol. 2019 Nov-Dec;94(6):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
5
Co-Occurrence of Multiple Endocrine Abnormalities Induced by the DIHS/DRESS.药物超敏反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和系统症状(DIHS/DRESS)诱发的多种内分泌异常共现
Int J Endocrinol. 2019 Oct 3;2019:7959615. doi: 10.1155/2019/7959615. eCollection 2019.
6
Human leukocyte antigen-associated severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions: from bedside to bench and beyond.人类白细胞抗原相关的严重皮肤药物不良反应:从床边到实验室再到更广泛领域
Asia Pac Allergy. 2019 May 31;9(3):e20. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2019.9.e20. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Genetic testing for prevention of severe drug-induced skin rash.用于预防严重药物性皮疹的基因检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):CD010891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010891.pub2.
8
Spontaneous cutaneous adverse drug reaction reports-An analysis of a 10-year dataset in Singapore.自发性皮肤不良反应报告——新加坡 10 年数据集分析。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019 Mar 13;7(2):e00469. doi: 10.1002/prp2.469. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Evaluation of Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in Antibiotic Usage: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Care Hospital, Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级护理医院抗生素使用中报告的药物不良反应评估:一项回顾性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Aug 20;9:809. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00809. eCollection 2018.
10
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome Identified in the Electronic Health Record Allergy Module.药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)综合征在电子健康记录过敏模块中的识别。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):633-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 31.