Department of General Surgery, Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214023, Jiangsu Province, China.,
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jan;125(2):537-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1033-6. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
Previous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between the ABCB1 polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer with conflicting results. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis of the ABCB1 gene and risk of breast cancer to obtain the most reliable estimate of the association. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched. A total of eight studies including 3,829 cases and 6,193 controls were identified. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the strength of associations between the ABCB1 C3435T and rs2214102 G>A polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer. Of these studies, only one deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Summary estimates indicated that the ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer in the allele contrast model (T vs. C, pooled OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 0.89-1.48); the co-dominant model (CT vs. CC, OR = 1.12 [0.86-1.46] and TT vs. CC, OR = 1.30 [0.79-2.15]); the dominant model (OR = 0.80 [0.63-1.02]; and the recessive model (OR = 0.83 [0.57-1.22]). In the sensitivity analysis by ethnicity, no statistically significant associations were detected in Asians. However, in Caucasian women the T allele contrast model and the TT genotype were each associated with increased risk: T vs. C, pooled OR (95% CI) = 1.26 (1.04-1.52) and TT vs. CC, OR = 1.48 (1.04-2.11). Accordingly, the dominant model yielded statistically significant results (pooled OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96) but not with the allele contrast model or the co-dominant model. There was evidence of publication bias (P = 0.02 for recessive model). In conclusion, there is limited evidence to indicate that the ABCB1 C3435T and rs2214102 G>A polymorphisms are associated with increased risk of breast cancer.
先前的流行病学研究评估了 ABCB1 多态性与乳腺癌风险之间的关联,但结果存在冲突。因此,我们进行了荟萃分析,以获得 ABCB1 基因与乳腺癌风险关联的最可靠估计。检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库。共纳入了 8 项研究,包括 3829 例病例和 6193 例对照。提取并合并了粗比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),以评估 ABCB1 C3435T 和 rs2214102 G>A 多态性与乳腺癌风险之间的关联强度。其中只有 1 项研究偏离 Hardy-Weinberg 平衡。汇总估计表明,ABCB1 C3435T 多态性与乳腺癌风险增加无关,在等位基因对比模型中(T 对 C,汇总 OR = 1.15;95%CI = 0.89-1.48);共显性模型(CT 对 CC,OR = 1.12 [0.86-1.46]和 TT 对 CC,OR = 1.30 [0.79-2.15]);显性模型(OR = 0.80 [0.63-1.02])和隐性模型(OR = 0.83 [0.57-1.22])。按种族进行敏感性分析时,在亚洲人群中未发现有统计学意义的关联。然而,在白种女性中,T 等位基因对比模型和 TT 基因型均与风险增加相关:T 对 C,汇总 OR(95%CI)= 1.26(1.04-1.52)和 TT 对 CC,OR = 1.48(1.04-2.11)。因此,显性模型得出了有统计学意义的结果(汇总 OR = 0.71,95%CI:0.52-0.96),但与等位基因对比模型或共显性模型无关。存在发表偏倚的证据(隐性模型 P = 0.02)。总之,有有限的证据表明 ABCB1 C3435T 和 rs2214102 G>A 多态性与乳腺癌风险增加相关。