Jing Lijun, Su Li, Ring Brian Z
Institute of Genomic and Personalized Medicine, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Key Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 5;9(6):e97522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097522. eCollection 2014.
The clinical use of genetic variation in the evaluation of cancer risk is expanding, and thus understanding how determinants of cancer susceptibility identified in one population can be applied to another is of growing importance. However there is considerable debate on the relevance of ethnic background in clinical genetics, reflecting both the significance and complexity of genetic heritage. We address this via a systematic review of reported associations with cancer risk for 82 markers in 68 studies across six different cancer types, comparing association results between ethnic groups and examining linkage disequilibrium between risk alleles and nearby genetic loci. We find that the relevance of ethnic background depends on the question. If asked whether the association of variants with disease risk is conserved across ethnic boundaries, we find that the answer is yes, the majority of markers show insignificant variability in association with cancer risk across ethnic groups. However if the question is whether a significant association between a variant and cancer risk is likely to reproduce, the answer is no, most markers do not validate in an ethnic group other than the discovery cohort's ancestry. This lack of reproducibility is not attributable to studies being inadequately populated due to low allele frequency in other ethnic groups. Instead, differences in local genomic structure between ethnic groups are associated with the strength of association with cancer risk and therefore confound interpretation of the implied physiologic association tracked by the disease allele. This suggest that a biological association for cancer risk alleles may be broadly consistent across ethnic boundaries, but reproduction of a clinical study in another ethnic group is uncommon, in part due to confounding genomic architecture. As clinical studies are increasingly performed globally this has important implications for how cancer risk stratifiers should be studied and employed.
基因变异在癌症风险评估中的临床应用正在不断拓展,因此,了解在一个人群中确定的癌症易感性决定因素如何应用于另一人群变得愈发重要。然而,关于种族背景在临床遗传学中的相关性存在相当大的争议,这既反映了遗传遗产的重要性,也体现了其复杂性。我们通过对六项不同癌症类型的68项研究中82个标记与癌症风险的报道关联进行系统综述来解决这一问题,比较不同种族群体之间的关联结果,并研究风险等位基因与附近基因位点之间的连锁不平衡。我们发现,种族背景的相关性取决于问题本身。如果问变异与疾病风险的关联是否在不同种族间具有一致性,我们发现答案是肯定的,大多数标记在不同种族群体中与癌症风险的关联显示出微不足道的变异性。然而,如果问题是一个变异与癌症风险之间的显著关联是否可能重现,答案是否定的,大多数标记在发现队列祖先以外的种族群体中无法得到验证。这种缺乏可重复性并非归因于其他种族群体中等位基因频率低导致研究样本不足。相反,种族群体之间局部基因组结构的差异与癌症风险关联的强度相关,因此混淆了对疾病等位基因所追踪的隐含生理关联的解释。这表明癌症风险等位基因的生物学关联可能在不同种族间大致一致,但在另一个种族群体中重复临床研究并不常见,部分原因是基因组结构的混杂。随着全球范围内越来越多地开展临床研究,这对癌症风险分层器的研究和应用方式具有重要意义。