• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨水泥固定型与非骨水泥固定型初次全髋关节置换术,哪种方法效果最佳?:一项随机对照试验的至少 17 年随访结果。

What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

London Health Sciences Centre, University Campus, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):209-17. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1459-5. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-010-1459-5
PMID:20625950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3008892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with high survival rates, but debate remains concerning the best fixation mode of THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 250 patients with a mean age of 64 years between October 1987 and January 1992 to compare the results of cementless and cemented fixation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were evaluated for revision of either of the components. One hundred twenty-seven patients had died (51%) and 12 (4.8%) were lost to followup. The minimum 17-year followup data (mean, 20 years; range, 17-21 years) for 52 patients of the cementless group and 41 patients of the cemented group were available for evaluation.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at 20 years revealed lower survival rates of cemented compared with cementless THA. The cementless tapered stem was associated with a survivorship of 99%. Age younger than 65 years and male gender were predictors of revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of future RCTs can be enhanced by randomizing patients in specific patient cohorts stratified to age and gender in multicenter RCTs. Including only younger patients might improve the efficacy of a future RCT with smaller sample sizes being required. A minimum 10-year followup should be anticipated, but this can be expected to be longer if the difference in level of quality between the compared implants is smaller.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

全髋关节置换术(THA)的存活率很高,但关于 THA 的最佳固定模式仍存在争议。

问题/目的:我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),纳入了 1987 年 10 月至 1992 年 1 月间的 250 名平均年龄为 64 岁的患者,比较了骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定的结果。

患者和方法

评估了两种固定方式的翻修情况。127 名患者死亡(51%),12 名(4.8%)患者失访。我们获得了非骨水泥组 52 名患者和骨水泥组 41 名患者的最低 17 年随访数据(平均 20 年;范围 17-21 年),用于评估。

结果

20 年的 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析显示,骨水泥固定的 THA 生存率低于非骨水泥固定。非骨水泥锥形柄的生存率为 99%。年龄小于 65 岁和男性是翻修手术的预测因素。

结论

在多中心 RCT 中,按年龄和性别分层将患者随机分组,可以提高未来 RCT 的有效性。只纳入年轻患者可能会提高未来 RCT 的效果,所需的样本量更小。预计需要至少 10 年的随访,但如果比较的植入物之间的质量差异较小,则可能需要更长的时间。

证据水平

I 级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者指南。

相似文献

1
What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial.骨水泥固定型与非骨水泥固定型初次全髋关节置换术,哪种方法效果最佳?:一项随机对照试验的至少 17 年随访结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):209-17. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1459-5. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
2
Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨假体进行初次全髋关节置换翻修术后的翻修率是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3391-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4245-6.
3
Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.55岁以下同一患者群体中超短型与传统解剖型非骨水泥股骨柄的对比研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2008-17. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4902-4. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
4
Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.75 岁以上患者中,骨水泥型或非骨水泥型股骨柄固定哪个更耐用?最佳表现的柄的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jul;476(7):1428-1437. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533621.57561.a4.
5
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA Implants in Patients Younger Than 20 Years.20岁以下患者的陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换植入物
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):520-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4546-9. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
6
Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.与一种独特的非骨水泥型股骨柄设计相关的假体周围股骨骨折风险增加。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2045-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4077-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
7
Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.平均随访20年时,髋关节发育不良患者初次髋关节置换术的满意结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2462-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4998-6. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
8
Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.在社区全关节登记处,年龄<70 岁的患者中,非骨水泥股骨柄与骨水泥股骨柄的生存率提高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3588-95. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3182-5. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
9
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.55岁及以上原发性骨关节炎患者的全髋关节置换术。芬兰关节置换登记处的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2160-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870.
10
High Survivorship With Cementless Stems and Cortical Strut Allografts for Large Femoral Bone Defects in Revision THA.非骨水泥型股骨柄与皮质支撑异体骨移植用于翻修全髋关节置换术中大股骨骨缺损的高生存率
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Sep;473(9):2990-3000. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4358-y. Epub 2015 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
UNCEMENTED HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: REVISION RATE, REVISION RISK FACTORS, AND REVISION CAUSE.非骨水泥型混合全髋关节置换术:翻修率、翻修风险因素及翻修原因
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Dec;62(4):652-658. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.04.10.
2
Perioperative and short-term outcomes of cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术的围手术期及短期疗效:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05709-4.
3
Comparative outcomes of cemented versus cementless stems in bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.双极半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型假体的疗效比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e39946. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039946.
4
Mid-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years.30 岁以下患者全髋关节置换术的中期结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3775-3786. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05473-5. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
5
Reduced mortality associated to cementless total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture.非骨水泥全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折降低死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 6;13(1):16849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43790-8.
6
Cemented versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complication and Readmission Rates.择期初次全髋关节置换术中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型股骨固定:一项关于短期并发症和再入院率的全国性分析。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 9;12(12):3945. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123945.
7
Long term results of total hip arthroplasty with cemented and cementless tapered femoral component.使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型锥形股骨假体进行全髋关节置换术的长期结果
SICOT J. 2023;9:17. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2023014. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
8
Cemented Versus Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Sickle Cell Disease Patients: A Retrospective Study.镰状细胞病患者中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Mar 14;15(3):e36138. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36138. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Can Selected Use of Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Components in a Broad Population Produce Comparable Results Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis?在原发性骨关节炎全髋关节置换术中,广泛人群中选定使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨假体能否产生可比的结果?
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S166-S173. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
10
Comparing modern uncemented, hybrid and cemented implant combinations in older patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.在接受初次全髋关节置换术的老年患者中比较现代非骨水泥、混合和骨水泥植入物组合:新西兰关节登记研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jun;143(6):3597-3604. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04610-2. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival of the cementless Spotorno stem in the second decade.无骨水泥型Spotorno股骨柄假体在第二个十年的生存率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2297-304. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0906-7. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
2
Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results.55岁以下患者使用非骨水泥喷砂直锥形钛柄。15至20年的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jun;91(6):1432-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00297.
3
Hierarchy of evidence: where observational studies fit in and why we need them.证据等级:观察性研究的地位及其必要性
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:2-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01571.
4
Wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中高交联聚乙烯的磨损率。一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):773-82. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00244.
5
Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.骨水泥型和非骨水泥型初次全髋关节置换术后的翻修:来自新西兰关节登记处的七年分析
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Apr;91(4):451-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.21363.
6
Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.55岁及以上患者原发性骨关节炎的骨水泥型全髋关节置换术:芬兰关节置换登记处对12种最常见骨水泥型植入物随访25年的结果
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Dec;90(12):1562-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.21151.
7
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.55岁及以上原发性骨关节炎患者的全髋关节置换术。芬兰关节置换登记处的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2160-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870.
8
Long-term results for the uncemented Zweymuller/Alloclassic hip endoprosthesis. A 15-year minimum follow-up of 320 hip operations.非骨水泥型Zweymuller/Alloclassic髋关节假体的长期结果。对320例髋关节手术进行至少15年的随访。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6):846-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.021. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
9
Results of the anatomic medullary locking total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of twenty years. A concise follow-up of previous reports.解剖型髓内锁定全髋关节置换术至少二十年的结果。对既往报告的简要随访。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jul;90(7):1524-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01142.
10
Midterm survivorship of a press-fit, plasma-sprayed, tri-spike acetabular component.压配式、等离子喷涂、三爪髋臼部件的中期生存率。
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Apr;24(3):391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.034. Epub 2008 Apr 8.