Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, 's Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 May 27.
Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a pivotal role in the management of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). When and for how long to apply ADT have remained controversial issues.
To review randomised studies of ADT (orchiectomy or luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogues) in PCa-both immediate and deferred/adjuvant studies-to elucidate a possible interaction between local treatment and ADT.
Published randomised studies on ADT in various stages of PCa were included in this review.
Studies of immediate versus deferred ADT without local treatment consistently showed only limited benefit for overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.97) and cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.89). In contrast, ADT as an adjuvant to radiation therapy in patients with high-risk localised disease or locally advanced disease was associated with substantial OS and CSS benefits. A similar benefit was seen in patients with proven systemic disease (node-positive patients after radical prostatectomy). Overall, the data suggest a clinically important survival benefit (HR for OS: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.61-0.79) when a local treatment has been applied to the primary tumour. Possible mechanisms of this therapeutic effect are discussed.
We conclude that an interaction between local treatment and ADT is suggested by this systematic review. In patients with advanced and aggressive disease who are at a high risk to die from PCa and who are treated for their primary tumour with curative intent, immediate and sustained ADT improves OS and CSS significantly. The local therapy in T3 and/or lymph node-positive disease is an essential part of the optimal treatment. However, this intensive treatment is unnecessary in a substantial number of patients with T3 and/or N1 disease with a slow natural history or high competing death risk.
雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)在局部晚期和转移性前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗中起着关键作用。何时以及应用多长时间的 ADT 仍然存在争议。
回顾 ADT(睾丸切除术或黄体生成素释放激素类似物)在 PCa 中的随机研究——包括即刻和延迟/辅助研究——以阐明局部治疗与 ADT 之间可能存在的相互作用。
本综述纳入了关于 ADT 在 PCa 各个阶段的已发表随机研究。
即刻 ADT 与延迟 ADT 而无局部治疗的研究一致表明,总生存(OS;风险比 [HR]:0.90;95%置信区间 [CI],0.83-0.97)和癌症特异性生存(CSS;HR:0.79;95%CI,0.71-0.89)仅有有限获益。相比之下,ADT 作为局部高危或局部晚期疾病患者的放疗辅助治疗与 OS 和 CSS 获益显著相关。在已证实有全身疾病的患者(根治性前列腺切除术的淋巴结阳性患者)中也观察到类似的获益。总体而言,这些数据表明,当对原发性肿瘤进行局部治疗时,生存获益具有重要的临床意义(OS 的 HR:0.69;95%CI,0.61-0.79)。讨论了这种治疗效果的可能机制。
本系统评价提示局部治疗与 ADT 之间存在相互作用。对于晚期和侵袭性疾病、死于 PCa 风险高且接受根治性局部肿瘤治疗的患者,即刻和持续 ADT 可显著提高 OS 和 CSS。T3 和/或淋巴结阳性疾病的局部治疗是最佳治疗的重要组成部分。然而,对于 T3 和/或 N1 疾病且自然病史缓慢或高竞争死亡风险的大量患者,这种强化治疗是不必要的。