Department of Virology, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, Prague-Ruzyne, the Czech Republic.
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Jul 15;10:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-146.
Reference genes are commonly used as the endogenous normalisation measure for the relative quantification of target genes. The appropriate application of quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), however, requires the use of reference genes whose level of expression is not affected by the test, by general physiological conditions or by inter-individual variability. For this purpose, seven reference genes were investigated in tissues of the most important cereals (wheat, barley and oats). Titre of Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) was determined in oats using relative quantification with different reference genes and absolute quantification, and the results were compared.
The expression of seven potential reference genes was evaluated in tissues of 180 healthy, physiologically stressed and virus-infected cereal plants. These genes were tested by RT-qPCR and ranked according to the stability of their expression using three different methods (two-way ANOVA, GeNorm and NormFinder tools). In most cases, the expression of all genes did not depend on abiotic stress conditions or virus infections. All the genes showed significant differences in expression among plant species. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta-tubulin (TUBB) and 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) always ranked as the three most stable genes. On the other hand, elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1A), eukaryotic initiation factor 4a (EIF4A), and 28S ribosomal RNA (28S rRNA) for barley and oat samples; and alpha-tubulin (TUBA) for wheat samples were consistently ranked as the less reliable controls.The BYDV titre was determined in two oat varieties by RT-qPCR using three different quantification approaches. There were no significant differences between the absolute and relative quantifications, or between quantification using GAPDH + TUBB + TUBA +18S rRNA and EF1A + EIF4A + 28S rRNA. However, there were discrepancies between the results of individual assays.
The geometric average of GAPDH, 18S rRNA and TUBB is suitable for normalisation of BYDV quantification in barley tissues. For wheat and oat samples, a combination of four genes is necessary: GAPDH, 18S rRNA, TUBB and EIF4A for wheat; and GAPDH, 18S rRNA, TUBB and TUBA for oat is recommended.
内参基因通常被用作相对定量目标基因的内参正常化测量。然而,定量实时 PCR(RT-qPCR)的适当应用需要使用其表达水平不受测试、一般生理条件或个体间变异性影响的内参基因。为此,在最重要的谷物(小麦、大麦和燕麦)的组织中研究了 7 个内参基因。使用不同的内参基因和绝对定量法测定燕麦中的大麦黄花叶病毒(BYDV)滴度,并对结果进行比较。
在 180 株健康、生理应激和病毒感染的谷物植物组织中评价了 7 个潜在内参基因的表达。这些基因通过 RT-qPCR 进行测试,并根据其表达稳定性使用三种不同方法(双向方差分析、GeNorm 和 NormFinder 工具)进行排序。在大多数情况下,所有基因的表达都不依赖于非生物胁迫条件或病毒感染。所有基因在植物物种间的表达均有显著差异。甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶(GAPDH)、β-微管蛋白(TUBB)和 18S 核糖体 RNA(18S rRNA)始终被评为三个最稳定的基因。另一方面,在大麦和燕麦样本中,延伸因子-1α(EF1A)、真核起始因子 4a(EIF4A)和 28S 核糖体 RNA(28S rRNA);在小麦样本中,α-微管蛋白(TUBA)始终被评为最不可靠的对照。使用三种不同的定量方法通过 RT-qPCR 测定了两种燕麦品种中的 BYDV 滴度。绝对和相对定量之间、使用 GAPDH+TUBB+TUBA+18S rRNA 和 EF1A+EIF4A+28S rRNA 进行定量之间均无显著差异。然而,个别检测结果存在差异。
GAPDH、18S rRNA 和 TUBB 的几何平均值适用于大麦组织中 BYDV 定量的归一化。对于小麦和燕麦样本,需要使用四个基因的组合:GAPDH、18S rRNA、TUBB 和 EIF4A 用于小麦;而 GAPDH、18S rRNA、TUBB 和 TUBA 推荐用于燕麦。