Mochari-Greenberger Heidi, Terry Mary Beth, Mosca Lori
Preventive Cardiology Program, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jul;110(7):1027-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.04.012.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether effectiveness of a special intervention to improve diet vs a control intervention differs by readiness to reduce dietary saturated fat based on the Transtheoretical Model Stages of Change among family members of hospitalized cardiovascular disease patients.
Stages of change (ie, precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance) were assessed by standardized questionnaire. Diet was measured by Block 98 Food Frequency Questionnaire at baseline and 1 year in participants in the Family Intervention Trial for Heart Health (n=501; 36% racial/ethnic minorities; 66% female). Therapeutic Lifestyle Change diet education was provided to each special intervention subject tailored to baseline stage of change.
Multivariable linear regression was used to examine whether the effect of the intervention was modified by stage of change.
Baseline saturated fat and cholesterol intakes were lower among those in maintenance stage vs others (9.9% vs 11.2% kcal; P<0.0001 and 112.2 vs 129.7 mg/1,000 kcal; P=0.0003, respectively). Overall, change in the percentage of calories from saturated fat from baseline to 1 year was -0.7 in the special intervention vs -0.4 in the control intervention (P=0.18). Among participants in contemplation, greater reductions in saturated fat (-2.1% vs +0.3% kcal; P=0.04) and cholesterol (-34.0 vs +32.6 mg/1,000 kcal; P=0.01) were seen in the special intervention vs control intervention. The special intervention was more likely than control intervention to achieve new adherence to a diet of <10% saturated fat/<300 mg cholesterol at 1 year among those not in maintenance stage (30% vs 15%; P=0.03). Control intervention participants were more likely than special intervention to revert to lower levels on the stage of change continuum from baseline to 1 year (17% vs 7%; P=0.002).
Effectiveness of an intervention to lower saturated fat varies by baseline stage of change among family members of hospitalized cardiovascular patients. This can be important to consider when designing research or clinical diet interventions.
本研究旨在评估基于跨理论模型改变阶段,针对住院心血管疾病患者家庭成员开展的改善饮食的特殊干预措施与对照干预措施的效果,是否因降低膳食饱和脂肪的意愿不同而存在差异。
通过标准化问卷评估改变阶段(即前意向阶段、意向阶段、准备阶段、行动阶段、维持阶段)。在心脏健康家庭干预试验(n = 501;36%为少数族裔;66%为女性)的参与者中,在基线和1年时使用Block 98食物频率问卷测量饮食情况。根据每个特殊干预对象的基线改变阶段,提供治疗性生活方式改变饮食教育。
采用多变量线性回归分析干预效果是否因改变阶段而异。
维持阶段的参与者基线饱和脂肪和胆固醇摄入量低于其他阶段的参与者(分别为9.9%对11.2%千卡;P<0.0001和112.2对129.7毫克/1000千卡;P = 0.0003)。总体而言,从基线到1年,特殊干预组饱和脂肪热量百分比的变化为-0.7,对照干预组为-0.4(P = 0.18)。在意向阶段的参与者中,特殊干预组的饱和脂肪(-2.1%对+0.3%千卡;P = 0.04)和胆固醇(-34.0对+32.6毫克/1000千卡;P = 0.01)降低幅度大于对照干预组。在非维持阶段的参与者中,特殊干预组在1年时比对照干预组更有可能达到新的饱和脂肪<10%/胆固醇<300毫克的饮食依从性(30%对15%;P = 0.03)。从基线到1年,对照干预组的参与者比特殊干预组的参与者更有可能在改变阶段连续体上回到较低水平(17%对7%;P = 0.002)。
针对住院心血管疾病患者家庭成员降低饱和脂肪的干预效果因基线改变阶段而异。在设计研究或临床饮食干预措施时,这一点很重要,需要加以考虑。