Murphy P A, Prewitt T E, Boté E, West B, Iber F L
Polyp Prevention Trial Clinical Center, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Fifth Ave. & Roosevelt Rd., PO Box 5000, 151V, Hines, IL 60141, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Feb;101(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00053-0.
Measure relationships of locus of control and social support to diet changes in an intervention trial.
Participants in the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT) completed Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) and Norbeck Social Support Questionnaires (NSSQ) and modified Block food frequency questionnaires. Data were collected at baseline and 1 year later.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: A convenience sample of PPT intervention (N = 68) and control (n = 43) participants at 1 clinical center participated in this ancillary study.
Mean daily dietary intakes after 1 year were compared with baseline values. Intervention participants' scores for MHLC internal locus of control and NSSQ total functional network were correlated with diet changes.
Group percentages were compared using the Fisher exact test; means were compared by t test.
Groups were comparable in demographics, baseline diet, and scores for internal locus of control and total functional network. Intervention group participants made greater diet changes than control participants in intake of fat (-27 g vs -8 g), fat as a percentage of kilocalories (-8% vs -2%), fiber as grams per 1,000 kcal (7 g vs 0.3 g), and daily fruit/vegetable servings (2.0 vs 0.2). Pearson correlations of diet changes with internal locus of control scores (all P > .05) were fat grams, r = 0.031; fat as percentage of kilocalories, r = 0.023; fiber grams per 1,000 kcal; r = 0.230; and fruit/vegetable servings, r = 0.186. Correlations with total functional network scores were: fat grams, r = 0.022 (P > .05); fat as percentage of kilocalories, r = -0.108 (P > .05); fiber grams per 1,000 kcal, r = 0.276, P < .05; and daily fruit/vegetable servings, r = 0.326, P < .05.
APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Intensive and skillful dietary intervention can succeed whether or not clients bring strong internal locus of control or social support to the diet change program.
在一项干预试验中测量控制点和社会支持与饮食变化之间的关系。
息肉预防试验(PPT)的参与者完成了多维健康控制点(MHLC)和诺贝克社会支持问卷(NSSQ)以及改良的布洛克食物频率问卷。在基线和1年后收集数据。
受试者/地点:来自1个临床中心的PPT干预组(N = 68)和对照组(n = 43)参与者的便利样本参加了这项辅助研究。
将1年后的平均每日饮食摄入量与基线值进行比较。干预组参与者的MHLC内控点得分和NSSQ总功能网络得分与饮食变化相关。
使用Fisher精确检验比较组百分比;通过t检验比较均值。
两组在人口统计学、基线饮食以及内控点和总功能网络得分方面具有可比性。干预组参与者在脂肪摄入量(-27克对-8克)、脂肪占千卡的百分比(-8%对-2%)、每1000千卡纤维克数(7克对0.3克)以及每日水果/蔬菜份数(2.0对0.2)方面的饮食变化大于对照组。饮食变化与内控点得分的Pearson相关性(所有P>.05)为:脂肪克数,r = 0.031;脂肪占千卡的百分比,r = 0.023;每1000千卡纤维克数,r = 0.230;以及水果/蔬菜份数,r = 0.186。与总功能网络得分的相关性为:脂肪克数,r = 0.022(P>.05);脂肪占千卡的百分比,r = -0.108(P>.05);每1000千卡纤维克数,r = 0.276,P<.05;以及每日水果/蔬菜份数,r = 0.326,P<.05。
应用/结论:无论客户是否为饮食改变计划带来强烈的内控点或社会支持,强化且巧妙的饮食干预都可能成功。