• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ECT 在慢性、重度、抗抑郁药和 CBT 难治性 PTSD 中的疗效:一项开放、前瞻性研究。

Efficacy of ECT in chronic, severe, antidepressant- and CBT-refractory PTSD: an open, prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2010 Jan;3(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2009.04.005
PMID:20633428
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment options are limited in patients with severe, chronic, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). There is little information on the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for PTSD.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2005, all consenting adults (n=20) with severe, chronic, extensively antidepressant-refractory PTSD were prospectively treated with a fixed course of 6 bilateral ECT treatments administered on an outpatient basis at a twice-weekly frequency. The primary outcome measure was improvement on the Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale (CAPS). Baseline refractoriness was defined as a failure to respond to an adequate course of at least 4 different antidepressant drugs along with 12 sessions of cognitive behavior therapy. Response to ECT was defined as at least 30% attenuation of CAPS ratings, and remission as an endpoint CAPS score of 20 or less. After ECT, patients were prescribed sertraline (100-150 mg/day) or mirtazapine (15-30 mg/day).

RESULTS

All but 3 patients completed the ECT course. An intent-to-treat analysis (n=20) showed statistically and clinically significant improvement in the sample as a whole: CAPS scores decreased by a mean of 34.4%, and depression scores by a mean of 51.1%. Most of the improvement in CAPS and depression ratings developed by the third ECT; that is, by day 10 of treatment, itself. The improvement in CAPS ratings was independent of the improvement in depression ratings; and improvement in CAPS did not differ significantly between patients with less severe vs more severe baseline depression. The response rate was 70%; no patient remitted. In the completer analysis (n=17), mean improvements were 40% and 57% for CAPS and depression ratings, respectively, and the response rate was 82%. Treatment gains were maintained at a 4-6 month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ECT may improve the core symptoms of PTSD independently of improvement in depression, and may therefore be a useful treatment option for patients with severe, chronic, medication- and CBT-refractory PTSD.

摘要

背景

在患有严重、慢性、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者中,治疗选择有限。关于电休克疗法(ECT)治疗 PTSD 的信息很少。

方法

在 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2005 年 12 月 31 日期间,所有同意的成年人(n=20)均患有严重、慢性、广泛抗抑郁药难治性 PTSD,前瞻性地接受固定疗程的 6 次双侧 ECT 治疗,每周两次,在门诊进行。主要结局指标是临床医生管理的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS)的改善。基线难治性定义为对至少 4 种不同抗抑郁药物的充分疗程以及 12 次认知行为治疗无反应。ECT 的反应定义为 CAPS 评分至少降低 30%,缓解定义为终点 CAPS 评分为 20 或更低。ECT 后,患者开服舍曲林(100-150mg/天)或米氮平(15-30mg/天)。

结果

除 3 名患者外,所有患者均完成了 ECT 疗程。意向治疗分析(n=20)显示,整个样本在统计学和临床上均有显著改善:CAPS 评分平均下降 34.4%,抑郁评分平均下降 51.1%。CAPS 和抑郁评分的大部分改善发生在第三次 ECT 之后;也就是说,在治疗的第 10 天。CAPS 评分的改善与抑郁评分的改善无关;基线抑郁较轻和较重的患者之间 CAPS 评分的改善无显著差异。反应率为 70%;无患者缓解。在完成者分析(n=17)中,CAPS 和抑郁评分的平均改善分别为 40%和 57%,反应率为 82%。治疗效果在 4-6 个月的随访中得以维持。

结论

ECT 可改善 PTSD 的核心症状,而与抑郁改善无关,因此可能是严重、慢性、药物和 CBT 难治性 PTSD 患者的有用治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of ECT in chronic, severe, antidepressant- and CBT-refractory PTSD: an open, prospective study.ECT 在慢性、重度、抗抑郁药和 CBT 难治性 PTSD 中的疗效:一项开放、前瞻性研究。
Brain Stimul. 2010 Jan;3(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
2
Prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of aripiprazole as a monotherapy in patients with severe chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: an open trial.评估阿立哌唑作为单一疗法治疗重度慢性创伤后应激障碍患者疗效的前瞻性研究:一项开放性试验。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2007;40(2):6-18.
3
A pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders.迷走神经刺激术(VNS)治疗抵抗性焦虑障碍的初步研究。
Brain Stimul. 2008 Apr;1(2):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
4
Retrospective evaluation of the dexamethasone suppression test as a predictor of response to electroconvulsive therapy in patients with comorbid major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.回顾性评估地塞米松抑制试验作为伴有共病的重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍患者对电抽搐治疗反应的预测因子。
J ECT. 2010 Sep;26(3):213-7. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181c30481.
5
Traumatized refugees: morbidity, treatment and predictors of outcome.受创伤的难民:发病率、治疗及预后预测因素
Dan Med J. 2014 Aug;61(8):B4871.
6
EFFICACY AND LONG-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOME OF COMORBID POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AND MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER AFTER ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY.创伤后应激障碍与重度抑郁症共病患者接受电休克治疗后的疗效及长期临床结局
Depress Anxiety. 2016 Jul;33(7):640-7. doi: 10.1002/da.22451. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
Cognitive-behavioral therapy as continuation treatment to sustain response after electroconvulsive therapy in depression: a randomized controlled trial.认知行为疗法作为电抽搐治疗后维持抑郁缓解的延续治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 1;76(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.11.030. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
Electroconvulsive therapy with a memory reactivation intervention for post-traumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial.电抽搐治疗联合记忆再激活干预创伤后应激障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Brain Stimul. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):635-642. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
Electroconvulsive therapy for comorbid major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.电休克治疗共病的重度抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍
J ECT. 2007 Jun;23(2):93-5. doi: 10.1097/01.yct.0000264369.38033.34.
10
Double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study of sertraline in military veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.舍曲林治疗创伤后应激障碍退伍军人的双盲安慰剂对照初步研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Apr;22(2):190-5. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200204000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjunctive electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of a patient with comorbid major depressive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anorexia nervosa - a case report.辅助性电休克治疗合并重度抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍和神经性厌食症患者——一例报告
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2024 Mar;33(1):43-48. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2024.135531. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Depression and Associated Factors Among Internally Displaced Persons in Al-Galgala, Sudan.苏丹加尔加拉境内流离失所者中创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的患病率及相关因素
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 May 28;20:1155-1168. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S462342. eCollection 2024.
3
Contemporary Approaches Toward Neuromodulation of Fear Extinction and Its Underlying Neural Circuits.
当代恐惧消退神经调节方法及其潜在神经回路
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023;64:353-387. doi: 10.1007/7854_2023_442.
4
Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A State-of-the-art Review.创伤后应激障碍的治疗:最新综述。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(4):557-635. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230428091433.
5
Electroconvulsive Therapy in Psychiatric Disorders: A Narrative Review Exploring Neuroendocrine-Immune Therapeutic Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.电抽搐治疗在精神障碍中的应用:探索神经内分泌-免疫治疗机制及临床意义的叙述性综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 22;23(13):6918. doi: 10.3390/ijms23136918.
6
Case Report: Catatonia Associated With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.病例报告:与创伤后应激障碍相关的紧张症
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 7;12:740436. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.740436. eCollection 2021.
7
Predominant Role of Serotonin at the Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapse with Redundant Monoaminergic Modulation.5-羟色胺在海马苔藓纤维突触处的主导作用及单胺能的冗余调节
iScience. 2020 Apr 24;23(4):101025. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101025. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
8
Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Treatment of Mood Disorders: One-Year Follow-up.电休克治疗心境障碍:一年随访
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2017 Sep;54(3):196-201. doi: 10.5152/npa.2016.14845. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
9
Neuro-stimulation Techniques for the Management of Anxiety Disorders: An Update.用于焦虑症管理的神经刺激技术:最新进展
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;14(4):330-337. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2016.14.4.330.
10
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Children of Conflict Region of Kashmir (India): A Review.印度克什米尔冲突地区儿童的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD):综述
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):VE01-VE03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/11766.7152. Epub 2016 Jan 1.