Giordano Tatiana, Steagall Paulo V M, Ferreira Tatiana H, Minto Bruno W, de Sá Lorena Sílvia Elaine Rodolfo, Brondani Juliana, Luna Stelio P L
Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Sao Paulo State University, UNESP Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2010 Jul;37(4):357-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00541.x.
To compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM), subcutaneous (SC) or oral transmucosal (OTM) buprenorphine administered to cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
Randomized, prospective and blinded clinical trial.
100 female cats.
Cats were assigned to receive 0.01 mg kg(-1) of buprenorphine administered by the IV, IM, SC or OTM route (n = 25/group). Buprenorphine was made up to 0.3 mL with 0.9% saline. DIVAS (0-100 mm) and simple descriptive scale (SDS) (from 0 to 4) pain and sedation scores were assigned to each cat before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after ovariohysterectomy. Buprenorphine and carprofen were administered for rescue analgesia. Data were analyzed using anova and Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).
There were no significant differences between groups for breed, body weight, anesthetic time or surgery time (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for sedation scores at any time. SDS pain scores did not detect any differences between groups (p > 0.05). DIVAS pain scores after OTM administration were significantly higher than IV and IM administration at 1 hour and at 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours, respectively (p < 0.05). DIVAS pain scores after SC administration were significantly higher than IV and IM administration at 2 hours and at 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours (p < 0.05), respectively. Six, four, 13 and 17 cats that received IV, IM, SC and OTM buprenorphine required rescue analgesia, respectively. There was a significantly higher incidence of treatment failure in cats that received SC and OTM buprenorphine compared with cats that received IV and IM buprenorphine (p < 0.05).
IV and IM administration of buprenorphine provided better postoperative analgesia than SC or OTM administration of the drug and these routes of administration should be preferred when buprenorphine is administered to cats.
比较静脉注射(IV)、肌肉注射(IM)、皮下注射(SC)或口腔黏膜给药(OTM)丁丙诺啡对接受卵巢子宫切除术的猫的术后镇痛效果。
随机、前瞻性、双盲临床试验。
100只雌性猫。
将猫分为四组,每组25只,分别接受静脉注射、肌肉注射、皮下注射或口腔黏膜给药0.01mg/kg的丁丙诺啡。丁丙诺啡用0.9%生理盐水配制成0.3mL。在卵巢子宫切除术前以及术后1、2、3、4、6、8、12和24小时,对每只猫进行数字疼痛评分(DIVAS,0 - 100mm)和简单描述性评分(SDS,0至4)以评估疼痛和镇静程度。若疼痛加剧,则给予丁丙诺啡和卡洛芬进行补救镇痛。采用方差分析和Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析(p < 0.05)。
各组在品种、体重、麻醉时间或手术时间方面无显著差异(p > 0.05)。各组在任何时间的镇静评分均无显著差异。SDS疼痛评分未发现各组之间存在差异(p > 0.05)。口腔黏膜给药后1小时以及3、4、6、8和12小时的DIVAS疼痛评分分别显著高于静脉注射和肌肉注射给药(p < 0.05)。皮下注射给药后2小时以及2、3、4、8、12和24小时的DIVAS疼痛评分分别显著高于静脉注射和肌肉注射给药(p < 0.05)。接受静脉注射、肌肉注射、皮下注射和口腔黏膜给药丁丙诺啡的猫分别有6只、4只、13只和17只需要补救镇痛。与接受静脉注射和肌肉注射丁丙诺啡的猫相比,接受皮下注射和口腔黏膜给药丁丙诺啡的猫治疗失败的发生率显著更高(p < 0.05)。
丁丙诺啡静脉注射和肌肉注射给药比皮下注射或口腔黏膜给药提供更好的术后镇痛效果,给猫使用丁丙诺啡时应优先选择这些给药途径。