Suppr超能文献

打鼾声音严重程度的夜间变化:一夜研究不可靠。

Night-to-night variation in snoring sound severity: one night studies are not reliable.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Jun;35(3):198-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02127.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the night-to-night variation in snoring severity; to compare this with inter-subject variation in snoring intensity: to compare multinight mean snoring scores with self-reported subjective scores.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Subjects were recorded during sleep at their own homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients with socially disruptive snoring awaiting surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Over four consecutive nights using a solid-state sound recording device, the mean, standard deviation and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated for (a) the loudest 1% of sound, (b) snore frequency and (c) total snore duration. Results were correlated with Snoring Symptom Inventory scores assessed immediately prior to these recordings.

RESULTS

Overall mean and intrasubject standard deviation for the loudest 1% of sound was 65.0 (+/-4.1) dB, for snore frequency was 245 (+/-104) per hour and for total snore duration was 4.3% (+/-2.1). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.78, 0.74 and 0.67, respectively, suggesting only moderate reliability of these outcome measures. No significant correlation was found between objective and subjective scores for either endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Natural night-to-night variation in snoring severity represents a significant proportion of overall snoring variance, thus one night studies of snoring are not reliable. The random error associated with one-night studies exceeds the expected effect size of snoring interventions and so multi-night studies of at least four nights are recommended to reduce the error. However, even multi-night objective measurements correlate poorly with subjective scores of snoring.

摘要

目的

量化打鼾严重程度的夜间变化;将其与打鼾强度的个体间变化进行比较;将多夜平均打鼾评分与自我报告的主观评分进行比较。

设计

前瞻性观察研究。

地点

受试者在家中睡眠时进行记录。

参与者

20 名患有社交性打鼾的患者,等待手术。

主要观察指标

使用固态录音设备,连续四个晚上计算(a)最响亮的 1%声音、(b)打鼾频率和(c)总打鼾持续时间的平均值、标准差和组内相关系数。结果与这些录音前立即评估的打鼾症状量表(Snoring Symptom Inventory,SSI)评分相关。

结果

最响亮的 1%声音的总体平均值和个体内标准差为 65.0(+/-4.1)dB,打鼾频率为 245(+/-104)次/小时,总打鼾持续时间为 4.3%(+/-2.1)。组内相关系数分别为 0.78、0.74 和 0.67,表明这些结局测量的可靠性仅为中等。客观和主观评分之间均未发现显著相关性。

结论

打鼾严重程度的自然夜间变化代表了整体打鼾变异的重要部分,因此一夜研究的打鼾不可靠。一夜研究的随机误差超过了打鼾干预的预期效应大小,因此建议进行至少四个晚上的多夜研究以减少误差。然而,即使是多夜的客观测量也与打鼾的主观评分相关性较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验