Suppr超能文献

随机交叉对照研究口腔矫治器治疗打鼾。

Randomised cross-over study of oral appliances for snoring.

机构信息

School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2010 Jun;35(3):204-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02126.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare a mandibular advancement splint to a control bite raising appliance in the treatment of snoring with or without mild obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

DESIGN

A prospective two-treatment randomised cross-over clinical trial.

SETTING

Single centre secondary care Dental Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-two subjects (36 men, 16 women) diagnosed with non-apnoeic snoring or mild obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (apnoea/hypopnoea index < or =15 events/h), were recruited from Departments of Respiratory Medicine and ENT surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Snoring Symptoms Inventory questionnaire (SSI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS) were used to evaluate changes in symptoms. Patient reported outcomes (compliance, adverse events, splint preference) were recorded by questionnaire. Subjects attended for five study visits and used a mandibular advancement splint and a bite raising appliance at home each for 4 weeks, with a 3-week washout period between devices.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-eight subjects completed the study. Both the mandibular advancement splint and bite raising appliance significantly reduced the SSI compared to the baseline scores: mandibular advancement splint 5.5, P = 0.013; bite raising appliance 3.1, P = 0.005. No statistically significant difference between the two treatment periods was detected (P > 0.05). The reduction in the Epworth Sleepiness Score was: mandibular advancement splint 1.0, P = 0.02; bite raising appliance 0.3, P = 0.4. The change in the Epworth Sleepiness Score was not statistically significantly different between the mandibular advancement splint and bite raising appliance treatment periods (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients diagnosed with snoring +/- mild OSA: 1 both the mandibular advancement splint and bite raising appliance designs of splint appeared to reduce the symptoms of snoring; 2 no difference in the magnitude of this effect was detected in favour of one design of splint.

摘要

目的

比较下颌前伸矫治器与对照性颌垫在治疗伴或不伴轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的打鼾中的效果。

设计

前瞻性两治疗随机交叉临床试验。

地点

单中心二级保健牙科医院。

参与者

52 名受试者(36 名男性,16 名女性),他们被诊断为非呼吸暂停性打鼾或轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(呼吸暂停/低通气指数<或=15 次/小时),来自泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔医院 NHS 基金会信托呼吸医学和耳鼻喉科手术系。

主要观察指标

采用打鼾症状问卷(SSI)和 Epworth 嗜睡评分(ESS)评估症状变化。通过问卷记录患者报告的结果(依从性、不良事件、矫治器偏好)。受试者在家中使用下颌前伸矫治器和颌垫,每种矫治器使用 4 周,两种矫治器之间有 3 周洗脱期,共进行 5 次研究访视。

结果和结论

38 名受试者完成了研究。与基线评分相比,下颌前伸矫治器和颌垫均显著降低了 SSI:下颌前伸矫治器 5.5,P=0.013;颌垫 3.1,P=0.005。两种治疗期之间未检测到统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。Epworth 嗜睡评分的降低情况为:下颌前伸矫治器 1.0,P=0.02;颌垫 0.3,P=0.4。下颌前伸矫治器和颌垫治疗期之间 Epworth 嗜睡评分的变化无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

在诊断为打鼾伴或不伴轻度 OSA 的这组患者中:1 下颌前伸矫治器和颌垫两种矫治器设计似乎都能减轻打鼾症状;2 未发现一种矫治器设计在效果的大小上具有优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验