• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在监管中使用心理健康法庭出庭。

The use of mental health court appearances in supervision.

机构信息

University at Albany, State University of New York, United States.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(4):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.010
PMID:20638726
Abstract

A defining feature of mental health courts (MHCs) is the requirement that enrollees appear periodically for status review hearings before the MHC judge. Although the research base on these specialty courts is growing, MHC appearances have yet to be examined. In the present study, the authors followed more than 400 MHC clients from four courts. We examined the number of court appearances that were mandated versus attended, the number of bench warrants issued, and the proportion of court appearances that were made in-custody versus out-of-custody. Finally, we describe and report on the proportion of clients at each court who had graduated, had been terminated, or who were still in the court one year following enrollment.

摘要

心理健康法庭(MHC)的一个显著特点是要求参与者定期出席 MHC 法官的状况审查听证会。尽管有关这些特别法庭的研究基础正在不断扩大,但 MHC 的出庭情况尚未得到审查。在本研究中,作者跟踪了来自四个法庭的 400 多名 MHC 客户。我们检查了强制性出庭和实际出庭的次数、发出的 bench warrant 的数量以及被监禁和非监禁的出庭比例。最后,我们描述并报告了每个法庭中毕业、被终止或在注册后一年仍在法庭的客户比例。

相似文献

1
The use of mental health court appearances in supervision.在监管中使用心理健康法庭出庭。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(4):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
2
A multi-site study of the use of sanctions and incentives in mental health courts.多地点研究在心理健康法院中使用制裁和激励措施。
Law Hum Behav. 2013 Feb;37(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/h0093989. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
Enrollment in mental health courts: voluntariness, knowingness, and adjudicative competence.心理健康法庭的入庭:自愿性、知晓性和裁决能力。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Apr;34(2):91-104. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9170-8. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
4
From referral to disposition: case processing in seven mental health courts.从转介到处置:七个心理健康法庭的案件处理
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):215-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.641.
5
Why do mental health courts work? A confluence of treatment, support & adroit judicial supervision.心理健康法庭为何能发挥作用?是治疗、支持与巧妙司法监督的共同作用。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;37(6):572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.031. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
6
Integrating the criminal justice system into mental health service delivery: the worcester diversion experience.将刑事司法系统纳入心理健康服务提供体系:伍斯特分流经验
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):277-93. doi: 10.1002/bsl.648.
7
Examining the links between therapeutic jurisprudence and mental health court completion.审视治疗法学与心理健康法庭结案之间的联系。
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Apr;38(2):109-18. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000041. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
8
Evaluating the efficiency and community safety goals of the Broward County Mental Health Court.
Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):227-43. doi: 10.1002/bsl.647.
9
Recognition and understanding of goals and roles: The key internal features of mental health court teams.目标和角色的识别与理解:心理健康法院团队的关键内在特征。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
10
How mental health courts function: Outcomes and observations.心理健康法庭的运作方式:结果与观察。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(4):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jul 27.