Emory Vaccine Center and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Immunol. 2010 Aug 15;185(4):2182-90. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001142. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
Viral infections often induce robust T cell responses that are long-lived and protective. However, it is unclear to what degree systemic versus mucosal infection influences the generation of effector and memory T cells. In this study, we characterized memory CD8(+) T cells generated after respiratory influenza virus infection and compared the phenotypic and functional qualities of these cells with memory T cells generated after systemic infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). Using a recombinant influenza virus expressing the LCMV gp(33-41) epitope and TCR transgenic CD8(+) T cells with a fixed TCR, we compared responses to the same Ag delivered by mucosal or systemic viral infection. Memory cells generated postinfection with either virus showed only a few phenotypic differences. Yet, influenza memory T cells produced lower amounts of effector cytokines upon restimulation and displayed reduced proliferation compared with LCMV-induced memory cells. Strikingly, we observed reduced expansion of spleen- and, in particular, lung-derived influenza memory cells after recall in vivo, which correlated with reduced early protection from secondary infection. These findings suggest that qualitatively different memory CD8(+) T cells are generated after respiratory or systemic virus infections.
病毒感染通常会诱导持久且具有保护作用的强 T 细胞反应。然而,系统感染和黏膜感染在多大程度上影响效应和记忆 T 细胞的产生尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们描述了呼吸道流感病毒感染后产生的记忆性 CD8(+) T 细胞,并将这些细胞的表型和功能特性与系统性感染淋巴细胞性脉络丛脑膜炎病毒(LCMV)后产生的记忆 T 细胞进行了比较。我们使用表达 LCMV gp(33-41)表位的重组流感病毒和具有固定 TCR 的 TCR 转基因 CD8(+) T 细胞,比较了通过黏膜或系统病毒感染传递相同抗原时的反应。两种病毒感染后产生的记忆细胞仅表现出一些表型差异。然而,与 LCMV 诱导的记忆细胞相比,流感记忆 T 细胞在再刺激时产生的效应细胞因子量较低,并且增殖能力降低。值得注意的是,我们观察到在体内再次感染时,脾脏来源的流感记忆细胞,尤其是肺来源的流感记忆细胞的扩增减少,这与二次感染的早期保护减少相关。这些发现表明,呼吸道或系统性病毒感染后产生的记忆性 CD8(+) T 细胞具有不同的质量。