Goldman E, Road J, Grassino A
Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University Hospitals, Columbus 43210-1228.
Anesthesiology. 1991 Jul;75(1):123-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199107000-00020.
Since the two muscles (costal and crural) that constitute the diaphragm are separate and histologically different, their individual recovery pattern from neuromuscular blockade also may be different. Therefore, we studied the recovery of force and shortening in the in vivo diaphragm from atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade in seven pentobarbital anesthetized dogs to assess segmental differences. Transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi), shortening of costal and crural segments, integrated electromyogram (EMG), and tidal volume (VT) were measured during spontaneous breathing. After atracurium had reduced VT to 30% of control, breathing parameters were followed until recovered to 90% of control values. In addition, force-frequency curves generated by supramaximal tetanic stimuli of the phrenic nerve were measured. Recovery times for tidal Pdi, tidal EMG, tidal shortening, low-frequency shortening, and twitch Pdi were twice as fast as for VT (40 +/- 4 min), reflecting a slower rate of recovery of accessory inspiratory muscles. High-frequency recovery was typically slower than that of VT. During tidal breathing and tetanic stimulation, costal and crural shortening recovered simultaneously. On the other hand, comparison between costal and crural by analysis of pressure-shortening relationships showed a segmental difference (crural shortened 30% more than costal at the same Pdi), which implied reduced afterload on the crural segment. However, since shortening and pressure were linearly related during paralysis and recovery, measurements of Pdi alone can accurately reflect changes in contractile mass when heterogeneity and afterload are controlled.
由于构成膈肌的两块肌肉(肋部和膈脚部)是分开的且组织学上不同,它们从神经肌肉阻滞中的各自恢复模式也可能不同。因此,我们研究了七只戊巴比妥麻醉犬体内膈肌从阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞中恢复力和缩短的情况,以评估节段差异。在自主呼吸期间测量跨膈压(Pdi)、肋部和膈脚部节段的缩短、肌电图积分(EMG)和潮气量(VT)。在阿曲库铵使VT降至对照值的30%后,跟踪呼吸参数直至恢复到对照值的90%。此外,测量了膈神经超强强直刺激产生的力-频率曲线。潮气量Pdi、潮气量EMG、潮气缩短、低频缩短和单刺激Pdi的恢复时间是VT恢复时间(40±4分钟)的两倍,这反映了辅助吸气肌的恢复速度较慢。高频恢复通常比VT慢。在潮气呼吸和强直刺激期间,肋部和膈脚部的缩短同时恢复。另一方面,通过压力-缩短关系分析对肋部和膈脚部进行比较显示存在节段差异(在相同Pdi下,膈脚部缩短比肋部多30%),这意味着膈脚部节段的后负荷降低。然而,由于在麻痹和恢复期间缩短和压力呈线性相关,当异质性和后负荷得到控制时,仅测量Pdi就能准确反映收缩质量的变化。