Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Marmara University, Altunizade mh., Aziziye sk., No: 8/1, Uskudar, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ann Nucl Med. 2010 Nov;24(9):691-5. doi: 10.1007/s12149-010-0397-3. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
Tc-99m DMSA renal cortical scan is a reference method for determining relative renal function (RRF). Tc-99m MAG-3 is also recommended for the estimation of RRF, particularly in young children. The aims of this study were to compare MAG-3 and DMSA RRF estimations and to assess the reproducibility of these estimations in children with unilateral hydronephrosis.
We reviewed MAG-3 and DMSA scans of 19 children with unilateral hydronephrosis and a normal contralateral unit. All were imaged with 2 agents within 3 months. MAG-3 RRF was calculated using 2 different time intervals (1-2 and 2-3 min) and perirenal C-type region of background activity. No background correction method was used in the calculation of DMSA RRF. All data were processed twice by two independent operators.
In the repeated estimates of MAG-3 RRF, the maximum mean intra-observer and inter-observer differences were 0.9% (SD 1.7%) and 1.4% (SD 3.3%), respectively. Intra-method analysis showed statistically significant agreement between repeated measures of RRF for two agents as well as for two operators (intra-class cross-correlation coefficients of early and later phase of MAG-3 and DMSA RRF values were 0.979, 0.993 and 0.996 for operator 1, and 0.986, 0.973 and 0.995 for operator 2, respectively; p < 0.001). There were statistically significant correlations between the MAG-3 and DMSA RRF estimations (r = 0.763/0.766 at 1-2 min, 0.835/0.825 at 2-3 min for the repeated measures of RRF for operator 1, and 0.812/0.793 and 0.83/0.89 for operator 2, respectively; p < 0.01, Pearson). Each scan classified as normal or abnormal according to RRF values inter-method analysis showed statistically significant agreement between MAG-3 and DMSA RRF estimations (Kappa statistics). However, there was a slight disagreement between the methods especially in infants and cases with higher grade of hydronephrosis, when 5% difference in estimations and supranormal estimates of RRF were taken into consideration.
Although DMSA and MAG-3 RRF estimations demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with good reproducibility in children with unilateral hydronephrosis, overall the finding of surprising estimates of kidney function with MAG-3 calls attention to the existence of some problems especially in infants and in those with higher grades of hydronephrotic kidneys.
Tc-99m DMSA 肾皮质扫描是确定相对肾功能 (RRF) 的参考方法。Tc-99m MAG-3 也被推荐用于估计 RRF,特别是在幼儿中。本研究的目的是比较 MAG-3 和 DMSA RRF 估计值,并评估这些估计值在单侧肾积水儿童中的可重复性。
我们回顾了 19 例单侧肾积水和正常对侧单位的 MAG-3 和 DMSA 扫描。所有患者均在 3 个月内使用 2 种药物进行成像。使用 2 种不同的时间间隔(1-2 分钟和 2-3 分钟)和肾周 C 型背景活动区域计算 MAG-3 RRF。DMSA RRF 的计算未使用背景校正方法。所有数据均由两名独立操作人员进行两次处理。
在 MAG-3 RRF 的重复估计中,最大平均观察者内和观察者间差异分别为 0.9%(SD 1.7%)和 1.4%(SD 3.3%)。方法内分析表明,两种药物的 RRF 重复测量以及两名操作人员之间的测量具有统计学显著一致性(早期和晚期 MAG-3 和 DMSA RRF 值的内类交叉相关系数分别为 0.979、0.993 和 0.996,操作员 1;分别为 0.986、0.973 和 0.995,操作员 2;p < 0.001)。MAG-3 和 DMSA RRF 估计值之间存在统计学显著相关性(r = 0.763/0.766 在 1-2 分钟,r = 0.835/0.825 在 2-3 分钟,对于操作员 1 的 RRF 重复测量,r = 0.812/0.793 和 0.83/0.89,对于操作员 2;p < 0.01,Pearson)。根据 RRF 值进行的每种扫描分类为正常或异常,方法间分析表明 MAG-3 和 DMSA RRF 估计值具有统计学显著一致性(Kappa 统计)。然而,特别是在婴儿和肾积水程度较高的情况下,当考虑到估计值相差 5%和 RRF 的超正常值时,两种方法之间存在轻微的不一致。
尽管 DMSA 和 MAG-3 RRF 估计值在单侧肾积水儿童中具有统计学显著相关性且具有良好的可重复性,但 MAG-3 对肾功能的惊人估计值的发现提醒人们,特别是在婴儿和肾积水程度较高的患者中,存在一些问题。