Department of Pedodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Nov;20(6):410-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01067.x.
To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements, Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India.
One hundred school children in the age group of 4-9 years who had bilateral matched pair of carious lesions in primary posterior teeth were included. A split mouth design was used in which two materials were randomly placed in contralateral sides. The performance of the restorations was assessed after 1 year using Frenken's criteria (1996). Survival analysis of restoration was done using chi-square test.
The survival rate of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX class I restorations were 97.4% and 94.9%, respectively. In class II cavities 95.1% and 88.5% of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX restorations were successful. Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX showed a success of 94.2% and 92.3% in small sized class II cavities. Amalgomer CR showed a 100% success for medium sized class I and II restorations. Whereas Fuji IX showed a 100% and 66.7% success in medium sized class I and II cavities.
The clinical performances of both materials were satisfactory at the end of 1 year and ART is suitable procedure to be done in a dental clinic for children.
比较两种玻璃离子水门汀，Amalgomer CR 和 Fuji IX 在印度使用无创伤性修复治疗（ART）技术制备的小和中龋洞中的临床性能。
将 100 名 4-9 岁的学龄儿童纳入研究，这些儿童的双侧后牙均有双侧对称的龋坏。采用分口设计，将两种材料随机放置在对侧。在 1 年后，使用 Frenken 标准（1996 年）评估修复体的性能。采用卡方检验对修复体的生存情况进行分析。
Amalgomer CR 和 Fuji IX Ⅰ类修复体的存活率分别为 97.4%和 94.9%。在Ⅱ类小龋洞中，Amalgomer CR 和 Fuji IX 的成功率分别为 95.1%和 88.5%。Amalgomer CR 和 Fuji IX 在小的Ⅱ类龋洞中成功率分别为 94.2%和 92.3%。Amalgomer CR 对中龋Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类修复体的成功率为 100%。而 Fuji IX 在中龋Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类修复体中的成功率分别为 100%和 66.7%。
在 1 年结束时，两种材料的临床性能均令人满意，ART 是适合在牙科诊所为儿童进行的治疗方法。
Zotero 插件