Department of Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):207.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.043.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the office-based component of delayed entry into prenatal care.
Phone numbers for all obstetrics offices in a single state were obtained from a commercial list. A research assistant who posed as a newly pregnant, fully insured woman asked each clinic when she should come in for her first prenatal visit.
Information was provided by 239 of the 279 (86%) offices. The recommended appointment times ranged from immediately (4 weeks of gestation) to 10.6 weeks, which averaged 6.37 weeks. Twenty-five percent of clinics recommended a first appointment at >/=8 weeks. Scheduling calls were not a source of prenatal advice: <5% of clinics asked about smoking, alcohol, or medical condition; 88% of clinics did not mention vitamins.
Office-based delays in scheduling the first prenatal visit occur in a substantial proportion of clinics, even for fully insured women. There is a need for a standard source of advice in early pregnancy.
本研究旨在评估延迟开始产前护理的门诊部分。
从商业名录中获取了一个州所有妇产科诊所的电话号码。一名假扮成刚怀孕、有充分保险的女性的研究助理询问每家诊所她应该何时进行第一次产前检查。
279 家诊所中的 239 家(86%)提供了信息。推荐的预约时间从立即(妊娠 4 周)到 10.6 周不等,平均为 6.37 周。25%的诊所建议首次预约时间大于等于 8 周。预约电话不是产前咨询的来源:不到 5%的诊所询问吸烟、饮酒或健康状况;88%的诊所没有提到维生素。
即使对于有充分保险的女性,门诊预约首次产前检查的延迟也发生在相当一部分诊所中。在孕早期,需要有一个标准的咨询来源。