A. M. Migliavacca Center for Liver Disease, First Division of Gastroenterology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep;7(9):485-94. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.101. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
Chronic infection with HCV has an estimated prevalence of 1.6-2.0% worldwide and is a major cause of liver-related death. The first attempts to halt the progression of infection relied on the empirical use of interferon (IFN), a naturally occurring cytokine that is implicated in antiviral innate immunity. The first studies of this treatment in the early 1990s, however, led to disappointing response rates. These response rates subsequently improved with the empirical addition of the guanosine analog ribavirin to the treatment regimen. To improve the effectiveness and tolerability of the three times per week therapeutic schedule of IFN, two forms of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) were developed in the early 2000s-PEG-IFN-alpha2a and PEG-IFN-alpha2b. These two compounds differ markedly in size, structure, site of attachment of the polyethylene glycol moiety and type of bond involved in pegylation, which ultimately confer different pharmacokinetics and biological activity. Unsurprisingly, researchers question whether the two PEG-IFNs also differ in clinical effectiveness, but the re-analysis of restrospective studies and the results of three head-to-head studies have left this issue open. We have, therefore, scrutinized the design and conduct of all available studies to unravel the reasons behind the therapeutic differences between PEG-IFN-alpha2a and PEG-IFN-alpha2b.
慢性 HCV 感染的全球患病率估计为 1.6-2.0%,是肝脏相关死亡的主要原因。最初尝试阻止感染进展依赖于干扰素(IFN)的经验性使用,干扰素是一种天然存在的细胞因子,与抗病毒固有免疫有关。然而,20 世纪 90 年代初对这种治疗方法的首次研究导致了令人失望的反应率。随后,随着利巴韦林这种鸟苷类似物被经验性地添加到治疗方案中,反应率得到了改善。为了提高每周三次 IFN 治疗方案的有效性和耐受性,两种聚乙二醇化干扰素(PEG-IFN)在 21 世纪初被开发出来——PEG-IFN-alpha2a 和 PEG-IFN-alpha2b。这两种化合物在大小、结构、聚乙二醇部分的附着部位和参与聚乙二醇化的键类型上有显著差异,最终赋予了不同的药代动力学和生物学活性。不出所料,研究人员质疑这两种 PEG-IFN 在临床疗效上是否也存在差异,但对回顾性研究的重新分析和三项头对头研究的结果使这个问题悬而未决。因此,我们仔细审查了所有可用研究的设计和实施情况,以揭示 PEG-IFN-alpha2a 和 PEG-IFN-alpha2b 之间治疗差异的原因。