Suppr超能文献

[C(1-2)静脉窦对寰枢椎螺钉置入手术安全性的影响]

[Effect of C(1-2) venous sinus upon operative safety of atlantoaxial screw insertion].

作者信息

Qian Lie, Li Li-jun, Pan Jie, Zhou Wei, Liu Yang-zhou, Zeng Cheng, Li Xin, Teng Hong-lin, Pang Qing-jiang, Tan Jun

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Apr 6;90(13):890-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new C(1) screw insertion technique to avoid injury to C(1-2) venous sinus in posterior atlantoaxial fixation.

METHODS

48 cases (96 sides of C(1) screws) undergoing posterior atlantoaxial fixation were retrospectively analyzed, including 28 cases of C(1) or C(2) fresh fracture and 20 cases of congenital malformation or old fracture & dislocation, among which 12 cases (24 sides) were operated by Goel lateral mass screws, 14 cases (28 sides) by TAN Mingsheng C(1) transpedicular screws and 44 sides of C(1) screws in 22 cases were inserted via notch on underside of C(1) posterior arch combined with bone wax column protecting C(1-2) venous sinus.

RESULTS

Bleeding was encountered in five sides of C(1) screws among 26 cases (52 sides) whose venous sinuses were not protected by bone wax column, involving 3 cases of Goel lateral screw implant fixation. There was statistical difference in the incidence rate of bleeding between Goel technique and ours (P < 0.05) while there was no statistical difference between C(1) transpedicular technique and ours (P > 0.05) or between Goel sides of Goel lateral mass screws (12.5%) and 2 sides of C(1) transpedicular screws (7.1%). It occurred in none of 22 cases (44 sides) with our presented technique. There was a significant difference between Goel lateral screw implant fixation and C(1) transpedicular technique (P > 0.05). All the screws were implanted successfully. All cases were followed up and there was not any sign of implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our presented C(1) screw insertion technique can provide a better bony landmark and vascular protection, stronger bony holding power and more extensive applicability to reduce injury to C(1-2) venous sinus and increase the surgical safety.

摘要

目的

介绍一种新的C1螺钉置入技术,以避免在寰枢椎后路固定术中损伤C1-2静脉窦。

方法

回顾性分析48例行寰枢椎后路固定术的患者(96侧C1螺钉),其中C1或C2新鲜骨折28例,先天性畸形或陈旧性骨折脱位20例。其中,采用Goel侧块螺钉固定12例(24侧),谭明生C1经椎弓根螺钉固定14例(28侧),22例患者44侧C1螺钉经C1后弓下缘切口置入并结合骨蜡柱保护C1-2静脉窦。

结果

在26例(52侧)未采用骨蜡柱保护静脉窦的患者中,5侧C1螺钉出现出血,其中3例为Goel侧块螺钉置入固定。Goel技术与我们的技术在出血发生率上有统计学差异(P<0.05),而C1经椎弓根技术与我们的技术之间无统计学差异(P>0.05),Goel侧块螺钉的12.5%与C1经椎弓根螺钉的2侧(7.1%)之间也无统计学差异。采用我们提出的技术,22例(44侧)均未发生出血。Goel侧块螺钉置入固定与C1经椎弓根技术之间有显著差异(P>0.05)。所有螺钉均成功置入。所有患者均获随访,未出现内固定失败迹象。

结论

我们提出的C1螺钉置入技术能提供更好的骨性标志和血管保护,具有更强的骨把持力和更广泛的适用性,可减少对C1-2静脉窦的损伤,提高手术安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验