• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症相关知识的医师认知调查:他们能否及时识别?

Survey on physicians' knowledge of sepsis: do they recognize it promptly?

机构信息

Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Terapia Intensiva. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2010 Dec;25(4):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.012
PMID:20646902
Abstract

PURPOSE

In Brazil, sepsis has a high mortality; and early recognition is essential in outcome. The aim of the study was to evaluate physicians' knowledge about systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock concepts.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study performed in 21 hospitals in Brazil, which enrolled physicians working in the participant institutions. A previously validated questionnaire was applied to physicians including 5 clinical cases.

RESULTS

Twenty-one Brazilian institutions enrolled 917 physicians. The percentage of physicians correctly recognizing SIRS, infection, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock was 78.2%, 92.6%, 27.3%, 56.7%, and 81.0%, respectively. Intensivists performed better in all diagnoses. There was a significantly higher rate of correct answers for SIRS (P < .001), sepsis (P = .001), and severe sepsis (P = .032) among physicians from university hospitals as compared with those from public hospitals. A mean global score of 3.36 ± 1.08 was found, with better performance for residents (P = .012) and intensivists (P < .001); but no difference was found for emergency physicians (P = .875).

CONCLUSION

The prompt recognition of sepsis and its severity is not satisfactory. This difference is probably due to the difficulty in the recognition of organ dysfunction, which hampers early identification of septic patients.

摘要

目的

在巴西,脓毒症的死亡率很高;因此早期识别对于改善预后至关重要。本研究旨在评估医生对全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克概念的认识。

方法

这是一项在巴西 21 家医院进行的前瞻性、观察性研究,招募了在参与机构工作的医生。采用了一份预先验证的问卷,其中包括 5 个临床病例,对医生进行评估。

结果

21 家巴西机构共招募了 917 名医生。正确识别 SIRS、感染、脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克的医生比例分别为 78.2%、92.6%、27.3%、56.7%和 81.0%。重症监护医生在所有诊断中表现更好。与公立医院的医生相比,来自大学医院的医生对 SIRS(P<0.001)、脓毒症(P=0.001)和严重脓毒症(P=0.032)的正确回答率明显更高。总体平均得分为 3.36±1.08,住院医师(P=0.012)和重症监护医生(P<0.001)表现更好;但急诊医生之间没有差异(P=0.875)。

结论

及时识别脓毒症及其严重程度的能力并不理想。这种差异可能是由于对器官功能障碍的识别困难,这阻碍了对脓毒症患者的早期识别。

相似文献

1
Survey on physicians' knowledge of sepsis: do they recognize it promptly?脓毒症相关知识的医师认知调查:他们能否及时识别?
J Crit Care. 2010 Dec;25(4):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
2
Elevated nucleosome levels in systemic inflammation and sepsis.全身炎症和脓毒症中核小体水平升高。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul;31(7):1947-51. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000074719.40109.95.
3
[Epidemiology of severe sepsis at a German university hospital].[德国一家大学医院严重脓毒症的流行病学]
Med Klin (Munich). 2007 Mar 15;102(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1023-6.
4
[Systemic inflammatory response syndrome: is it comparable with severe sepsis?].[全身炎症反应综合征:它与严重脓毒症可比吗?]
Rev Med Chil. 1999 Nov;127(11):1339-44.
5
[Infection or SIRS--the problem of definition].[感染或全身炎症反应综合征——定义问题]
Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124(8):682-6.
6
The association of sepsis syndrome and organ dysfunction with mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection.急诊科疑似感染患者中脓毒症综合征及器官功能障碍与死亡率的关联。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;48(5):583-90, 590.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.007.
7
Sepsis and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome.脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2000 Jun;45(3):178-82.
8
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
9
[Biochemical disturbances in patients with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis. Part I. Biochemical disturbances in patients with sepsis].[全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和脓毒症患者的生化紊乱。第一部分。脓毒症患者的生化紊乱]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2005;59(4):865-72.
10
The definition of septic shock: implications for treatment.脓毒症休克的定义:对治疗的启示
Crit Care Resusc. 2007 Mar;9(1):101-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the outcomes of sepsis in Brazil: strategies and initiatives.改善巴西脓毒症的治疗效果:策略与举措
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 16;37:e20250313. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250313. eCollection 2025.
2
Uncovering knowledge of pediatric sepsis and recognition of septic shock: a survey among Brazilian pediatricians.揭示小儿脓毒症知识及识别脓毒性休克:巴西儿科医生的一项调查
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Mar 17;37:e20250143. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250143. eCollection 2025.
3
What Clinicians Think About When They Think About Sepsis: Results From a Survey Across the University of Maryland Medical System.
临床医生在思考脓毒症时的所想:马里兰大学医学系统的一项调查结果
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Dec 9;6(12):e1183. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001183. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
4
Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes to the Management of Sepsis in Jamaica.牙买加对脓毒症管理的知识、实践与态度
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2022 Nov 12;8(4):232-241. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2022-0024. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Knowledge and perception of Sepsis among Doctors in Karachi Pakistan.巴基斯坦卡拉奇医生对脓毒症的认知与了解
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Jan;38(2):380-386. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.ICON-2022.5775.
6
Prevalence and outcomes of sepsis in children admitted to public and private hospitals in Latin America: a multicenter observational study.拉丁美洲公立和私立医院住院儿童脓毒症的患病率和结局:一项多中心观察性研究。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021 Apr-Jun;33(2):231-242. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210030.
7
Health inequities in the diagnosis and outcome of sepsis in Argentina: a prospective cohort study.阿根廷脓毒症诊断与转归中的健康不平等:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 9;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2522-6.
8
Recognition and management of sepsis by junior doctors.初级医生对脓毒症的识别与处理
Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun;3(2):99-102. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-99.
9
Epidemiology of Pediatric Septic Shock.小儿脓毒性休克的流行病学
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2019 Mar;8(1):3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676634. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
10
Identifying Hesitation and Discomfort with Diagnosing Sepsis: Survey of a Pediatric Tertiary Care Center.识别诊断脓毒症时的犹豫与不适:一家儿科三级护理中心的调查
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018 Sep 5;3(5):e099. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000099. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.