Suppr超能文献

脓毒症相关知识的医师认知调查:他们能否及时识别?

Survey on physicians' knowledge of sepsis: do they recognize it promptly?

机构信息

Disciplina de Anestesiologia, Dor e Terapia Intensiva. Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2010 Dec;25(4):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In Brazil, sepsis has a high mortality; and early recognition is essential in outcome. The aim of the study was to evaluate physicians' knowledge about systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock concepts.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study performed in 21 hospitals in Brazil, which enrolled physicians working in the participant institutions. A previously validated questionnaire was applied to physicians including 5 clinical cases.

RESULTS

Twenty-one Brazilian institutions enrolled 917 physicians. The percentage of physicians correctly recognizing SIRS, infection, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock was 78.2%, 92.6%, 27.3%, 56.7%, and 81.0%, respectively. Intensivists performed better in all diagnoses. There was a significantly higher rate of correct answers for SIRS (P < .001), sepsis (P = .001), and severe sepsis (P = .032) among physicians from university hospitals as compared with those from public hospitals. A mean global score of 3.36 ± 1.08 was found, with better performance for residents (P = .012) and intensivists (P < .001); but no difference was found for emergency physicians (P = .875).

CONCLUSION

The prompt recognition of sepsis and its severity is not satisfactory. This difference is probably due to the difficulty in the recognition of organ dysfunction, which hampers early identification of septic patients.

摘要

目的

在巴西,脓毒症的死亡率很高;因此早期识别对于改善预后至关重要。本研究旨在评估医生对全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克概念的认识。

方法

这是一项在巴西 21 家医院进行的前瞻性、观察性研究,招募了在参与机构工作的医生。采用了一份预先验证的问卷,其中包括 5 个临床病例,对医生进行评估。

结果

21 家巴西机构共招募了 917 名医生。正确识别 SIRS、感染、脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克的医生比例分别为 78.2%、92.6%、27.3%、56.7%和 81.0%。重症监护医生在所有诊断中表现更好。与公立医院的医生相比,来自大学医院的医生对 SIRS(P<0.001)、脓毒症(P=0.001)和严重脓毒症(P=0.032)的正确回答率明显更高。总体平均得分为 3.36±1.08,住院医师(P=0.012)和重症监护医生(P<0.001)表现更好;但急诊医生之间没有差异(P=0.875)。

结论

及时识别脓毒症及其严重程度的能力并不理想。这种差异可能是由于对器官功能障碍的识别困难,这阻碍了对脓毒症患者的早期识别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验