比较 Vibringe 系统与注射器和被动超声冲洗在去除模拟根管不规则处的碎片方面的效果。
Comparison of the Vibringe system with syringe and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities.
机构信息
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
出版信息
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1410-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.023. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of a sonic device (Vibringe), syringe irrigation, and passive ultrasonic irrigation in the removal of debris from simulated root canal irregularities.
METHODS
Root canals with 2 standardized grooves in the apical and coronal parts were filled with dentin debris. Three different irrigation procedures were performed with NaOCl (1%) and (1) syringe irrigation, (2) Vibringe, and (3) passive ultrasonic irrigation. The amount of remaining debris was evaluated by using a 4-grade scoring system.
RESULTS
Ultrasonic irrigation removed debris significantly better from the artificial canal irregularities than the Vibringe System and syringe irrigation (P < .0001). The Vibringe System demonstrated significantly better results than syringe irrigation in the apical part of the root canal (P = .011).
CONCLUSIONS
Passive ultrasonic irrigation is more effective than the Vibringe System or syringe irrigation in removing debris. The sonic device demonstrated significantly better results than syringe irrigation in the apical root canal third.
简介
本研究旨在比较声能器械（Vibringe）、注射器冲洗和被动超声冲洗在去除模拟根管不规则处的碎屑方面的效率。
方法
将牙本质碎屑填充到根尖和冠部有 2 个标准化凹槽的根管中。使用 NaOCl（1%）进行三种不同的冲洗程序：（1）注射器冲洗，（2）Vibringe，（3）被动超声冲洗。使用 4 级评分系统评估剩余碎屑的量。
结果
超声冲洗在去除人工根管不规则处的碎屑方面明显优于 Vibringe 系统和注射器冲洗（P <.0001）。Vibringe 系统在根管根尖部分的效果明显优于注射器冲洗（P =.011）。
结论
被动超声冲洗在去除碎屑方面比 Vibringe 系统或注射器冲洗更有效。声能器械在根管根尖部分的效果明显优于注射器冲洗。
Zotero 插件