Liang Ailin, Huang Luo, Li Baoyu, Huang Yihua, Zhou Xiaoyan, Zhang Xufang, Gong Qimei
Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 56, Lingyuan West Road, Guangzhou 510055, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, No. 74 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou 510080, China.
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 13;11(20):6053. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206053.
Accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) is an inevitable by-product during endodontic treatment and is difficult to remove completely using traditional syringe and needle irrigation (SNI). Adjunctive irrigation is proposed to assist the clean-up of AHTD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the AHTD removal efficacy of different root canal irrigation devices using micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT). A literature search was carried out within the main scientific databases until 20 June 2022. All results were screened with detailed eligibility criteria. Eleven studies were included for analysis. SNI, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), negative pressure systems, sonically activated irrigation (SAI), mechanical-activated system and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) were assessed. PUI is superior to SNI for debris removal and LAI has better AHTD removal performance than PUI. The negative pressure system and mechanical-activated system were proved to be less effective. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021273892).
累积的硬组织碎屑(AHTD)是根管治疗过程中不可避免的副产品,使用传统的注射器和针头冲洗(SNI)很难将其完全清除。建议采用辅助冲洗来协助清理AHTD。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在使用微型计算机断层扫描(Micro-CT)评估不同根管冲洗装置清除AHTD的效果。在主要科学数据库中进行了文献检索,直至2022年6月20日。所有结果均根据详细的纳入标准进行筛选。纳入11项研究进行分析。评估了SNI、被动超声冲洗(PUI)、负压系统、声激活冲洗(SAI)、机械激活系统和激光激活冲洗(LAI)。PUI在清除碎屑方面优于SNI,LAI在清除AHTD方面比PUI表现更好。负压系统和机械激活系统被证明效果较差。注册信息:PROSPERO(CRD42021273892)。