Likosky Donald S, FitzGerald Daniel C, Groom Robert C, Jones Dwayne K, Baker Robert A, Shann Kenneth G, Mazer C David, Spiess Bruce D, Body Simon C
Department of Surgery, The Center for Leadership and Improvement, Dartmouth Medical School, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010 Jun;42(2):114-21.
The 2007 Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline for Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery was recently promulgated and has received much attention. Using a survey of cardiac anesthesiologists and perfusionists' clinical practice, we assessed the current practices of perfusion, anesthesia, and surgery, as recommended by the Guidelines and also determined the role the Guidelines had in changing these practices. Nontrainee members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, the American Academy of Cardiovascular Perfusion, the Canadian Society of Clinical Perfusion, and the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology were surveyed using a standardized survey instrument that examined clinical practices and responses to the Guidelines. One thousand four hundred and two surveys from 1,061 institutions principally in the United States (677 institutions) and Canada (34 institutions) were returned, with a 32% response rate. There was wide distribution of the Guidelines with 78% of anesthesiologists and 67% of perfusionists reporting having read all, part, or a summary of the Guidelines. However, only 20% of respondents reported that an institutional discussion had taken place as a result of the Guidelines, and only 14% of respondents reported that an institutional monitoring group had been formed. There was wide variability in current preoperative testing, perfusion, surgical, and pharmacological practices reported by respondents. Twenty-six percent of respondents reported one or more practice changes in response to the Guidelines.The changes made were reported to be highly (9%) or somewhat effective (31%) in reducing overall transfusion rates. Only four of 38 Guideline recommendations were reported by more than 5% of respondents to have been changed in response to the Guidelines. Wide variation in clinical practices of cardiac surgery was reported. Little change in clinical practices was attributed to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Guidelines.
胸外科医师协会和心血管麻醉医师协会2007年发布的《心脏手术围手术期输血与血液保护临床实践指南》最近已颁布并备受关注。通过对心脏麻醉医师和灌注师临床实践的调查,我们评估了灌注、麻醉和手术的当前实践情况(正如指南所推荐的那样),并确定了该指南在改变这些实践方面所起的作用。我们使用标准化调查工具,对心血管麻醉医师协会、美国心血管灌注学会、加拿大临床灌注学会和美国体外技术学会的非实习会员进行了调查,该工具考察了临床实践以及对指南的反应。共收到来自1061家机构(主要在美国的677家机构和加拿大的34家机构)的1402份调查问卷,回复率为32%。该指南传播广泛,78%的麻醉医师和67%的灌注师报告读过该指南的全部、部分或摘要。然而,只有20%的受访者报告称因该指南进行了机构讨论,只有14%的受访者报告称成立了机构监测小组。受访者报告的当前术前检查、灌注、手术和药物治疗实践存在很大差异。26%的受访者报告称因该指南有一项或多项实践改变。据报告,这些改变在降低总体输血率方面非常有效(9%)或有些效果(31%)。在38项指南建议中,只有4项被超过5%的受访者报告因该指南而有所改变。报告称心脏手术的临床实践差异很大。胸外科医师协会/心血管麻醉医师协会指南对临床实践的改变很小。