• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳房美容术前的乳腺癌筛查:美国整形外科学会成员对美国癌症协会指南的遵循情况。

Breast cancer screening prior to cosmetic breast surgery: ASPS members' Adherence to American Cancer Society Guidelines.

机构信息

Philadelphia, Pa. From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1375-1385. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b988c4.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b988c4
PMID:20009821
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine the self-reported breast cancer screening practices of American plastic surgeons and the degree to which those practices adhere to the American Cancer Society guidelines. An independent analysis of subgroups divided by gender, years in practice, and practice setting was performed and the implications of the results are discussed.

METHODS

The authors conducted an online survey of the members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Questions assessed practice composition, American Cancer Society guideline familiarity, and preoperative breast cancer screening in patients seeking aesthetic breast surgery. Responses were summarized, subgroup comparisons were made, and logistic regression was used to determine predictors of physician practices.

RESULTS

The 1066 respondents were predominantly male (82 percent) and consisted largely of private practitioners (73 percent). In total, 47 percent appeared to follow the American Cancer Society guidelines, while 64 percent claimed familiarity. Being male predicted more accurate guideline knowledge, but being female resulted in more aggressive screening and possibly more diagnoses. Number of years in practice and familiarity with the American Cancer Society guidelines also resulted in more perioperative diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the American Cancer Society guidelines is an essential component of effective cancer screening, but only two-thirds of plastic surgeons claim familiarity with them, and fewer than half report concordant practices. As plastic surgeons who often perform surgical procedures on the breast in women with no history of breast disease, we have an obligation to understand and apply consistent, reliable breast cancer screening practices to ensure the well-being of our patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定美国整形外科学者报告的乳腺癌筛查实践,以及这些实践与美国癌症协会指南的一致性程度。通过对按性别、从业年限和执业环境划分的亚组进行独立分析,探讨了研究结果的意义。

方法

作者对美国整形外科学会的成员进行了在线调查。调查问题评估了实践构成、对美国癌症协会指南的熟悉程度以及寻求美容乳房手术的患者术前乳腺癌筛查情况。对调查结果进行了总结,进行了亚组比较,并采用逻辑回归分析确定了医生实践的预测因素。

结果

1066 名受访者主要为男性(82%),大部分为私人执业者(73%)。总体而言,47%的人似乎遵循美国癌症协会指南,而 64%的人声称熟悉这些指南。男性预测更准确的指南知识,但女性导致更积极的筛查和可能更多的诊断。从业年限和对美国癌症协会指南的熟悉程度也导致了更多的围手术期诊断。

结论

对美国癌症协会指南的了解是有效癌症筛查的重要组成部分,但只有三分之二的整形外科医生声称熟悉这些指南,不到一半的人报告了一致的实践。作为经常对无乳腺疾病史的女性进行乳房手术的整形外科医生,我们有责任了解并应用一致、可靠的乳腺癌筛查实践,以确保患者的健康。

相似文献

1
Breast cancer screening prior to cosmetic breast surgery: ASPS members' Adherence to American Cancer Society Guidelines.乳房美容术前的乳腺癌筛查:美国整形外科学会成员对美国癌症协会指南的遵循情况。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1375-1385. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b988c4.
2
Breast Implant Imaging Surveillance among U.S. Plastic Surgeons: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Recommendations versus Clinical Reality.美国整形外科医生对乳房植入物的影像学监测:美国食品和药物管理局的建议与临床实际情况对比。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;145(6):1381-1387. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006812.
3
Mammography Screening Practices in Average-Risk Women Aged 40-49 Years in Primary Care: A Comparison of Physician and Nonphysician Providers in Minnesota.在初级保健中对 40-49 岁一般风险女性的乳房 X 线筛查实践:明尼苏达州医生和非医生提供者的比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jan;29(1):91-99. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7436. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
4
Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.医生对美国预防服务工作组乳腺 X 线摄影指南的依从性。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):e313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003.
5
Linking physician attitudes to their breast cancer screening practices: A survey of US primary care providers and gynecologists.将医师态度与其乳腺癌筛查实践联系起来:对美国初级保健提供者和妇科医生的调查。
Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:90-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
6
Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons.美国整形医生使用自体和显微乳房重建术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):534-541. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ae03e.
7
The effect of the perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists upon clinical practices.胸外科医师协会和心血管麻醉医师协会的心脏手术围手术期输血与血液保护临床实践指南对临床实践的影响。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010 Jun;42(2):114-21.
8
Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening.初级保健医生对 2009 年美国妇产科医师学会宫颈癌筛查指南的依从性存在差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 May;23(5):397-403. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4475. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
9
The influence of career stage, practice type and location, and physician's sex on surgical practices among board-certified plastic surgeons performing breast augmentation.职业阶段、执业类型和地点以及医生性别对行隆胸术的整形外科委员会认证医师手术实践的影响。
Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Nov;31(8):941-52. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11422227.
10
Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin.威斯康星州接受调查的初级保健提供者的乳腺癌筛查建议差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2553-2559. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05922-y. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Occult Pathologic Findings in Reduction Mammaplasty in 5781 Patients-An International Multicenter Study.5781例患者缩乳术中的隐匿性病理发现——一项国际多中心研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 13;9(7):2223. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072223.
2
Adherence to practice guidelines based on American Board of Plastic Surgery Maintenance of Certification data.基于美国整形外科学会维持认证数据的实践指南的依从性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 May;127(5):2101-2107. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820e91ca.