• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States: towards a national regulatory framework?

作者信息

Merchant Jennifer

机构信息

Université Assas-Sorbonne (Paris II).

出版信息

J Int Bioethique. 2009 Dec;20(4):55-71, 109-10. doi: 10.3917/jib.204.0055.

DOI:10.3917/jib.204.0055
PMID:20648936
Abstract

In most of the industrialized world, comprehensive oversight and/or regulation of assisted reproductive technology has been in place for some time now. For example, in countries such as France or the UK, fertility clinics are licensed by a government agency. This arrangement allows for rules to be modified as needed, and also provides a mechanism for ensuring that clinics are following them. Rules about permitted procedures, guided by consistent principles, are set and enforced by the licensing agency. Above all, countries that regulate assisted reproduction differ from the United States in one very crucial way: they regard health care as a right and provide it to their citizens. This paper will offer a panorama of the practice of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States, present some key events and the contemporary context that have provoked an urgent call for national regulation, examine some states wherein regulation exits, and estimate the possibility for a national regulatory framework.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States: towards a national regulatory framework?
J Int Bioethique. 2009 Dec;20(4):55-71, 109-10. doi: 10.3917/jib.204.0055.
2
An international view of surgically assisted conception and surrogacy tourism.外科辅助受孕与代孕旅游的国际视角。
Med Leg J. 2011;79(Pt 4):135-45. doi: 10.1258/mlj.2011.011029.
3
Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.禁止生殖旅游:土耳其的 ART 立法与第三方辅助生殖
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
4
Parenthood by pure intention: assisted reproduction and the functional approach to parentage.出于纯粹意愿的为人父母:辅助生殖与亲子关系的功能主义方法
Hastings Law J. 2002 Mar;53(3):597-679.
5
The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.关于人类受精与胚胎学的沃诺克委员会报告。
Mod Law Rev. 1985 Jan;48(1):73-85.
6
Welcome to the wild west: protecting access to cross border fertility care in the United States.欢迎来到蛮荒西部:保护美国跨境生育医疗服务的可及性。
Cornell J Law Public Policy. 2012 Winter;22(2):349-393..
7
New assisted reproductive technology laws in Victoria: a genuine overhaul or just cut and paste?维多利亚州新的辅助生殖技术法律:是真正的全面改革还是仅仅是照搬照抄?
J Law Med. 2011 Jun;18(4):835-50.
8
History of regulation of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the USA: a work in progress.美国辅助生殖技术(ART)监管的历史:一项正在进行的工作。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2003 May;6(2):64-70. doi: 10.1080/1464770312331369063.
9
A survey of UK fertility clinics' approach to surrogacy arrangements.英国生育诊所代孕安排方式的调查。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Sep;31(3):327-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
[New reproductive technologies in the United States: law(s) and practice(s)].[美国的新型生殖技术:法律与实践]
Med Sci (Paris). 2019 Mar;35(3):253-257. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2019032. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada's AHR Act.对 2010 年加拿大《人类生殖法》案的最高法院裁决的影响和反思。
Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:405-8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S27145. Epub 2011 Nov 29.