Research and Development, Leicestershire County and Rutland Community Health Services, Leicester, UK.
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Aug;66(8):1658-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05327.x.
This paper presents an integrative literature review of studies exploring the benefits and limitations of the recent expansion of the clinical role of nurses working in general practice in the United Kingdom.
Similar clinical outcomes and high levels of satisfaction with consultations undertaken by nurse practitioners compared to general practitioners in primary care have been reported in a Cochrane review [Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2004) vol. 5, p. CD001271]. Since then, nurse consultations have increased considerably as general practitioners have delegated part of their clinical workload to other general practice nurses. However, whether all general practice nurses can fulfil this extended role remains open to question.
An integrative review was performed. Nine electronic databases were searched. UK studies were included if they were published after the previous Cochrane review, i.e. between 2004 and 2009.
Eight studies were identified, most using qualitative methodology. The evidence suggested that the changes in nurses' role have been predominantly driven by the perceived increase in workload arising from the new general practitioner contract. Delegating work to nurses provided a means of organizing workload within a practice without necessarily allowing patient choice. Patients generally thought that all general practice nurses would be able to deal with simple conditions, but they would prefer to consult with a general practitioner if they thought it necessary. There were concerns about nurses' knowledge base, particularly in diagnostics and therapeutics, and their levels of training and competence in roles formerly undertaken by general practitioners.
There have been few studies in this key area of healthcare policy. There is a need for better training and support for nurses undertaking roles in consultation and for patients' views to be better represented.
本文对探索英国普通科执业护士临床角色扩展的益处和局限性的研究进行综合文献回顾。
Cochrane 综述[Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(2004)vol. 5,p. CD001271]报道,在初级保健中,与普通科医生相比,护士从业者进行的咨询具有相似的临床效果和高度的满意度。此后,随着全科医生将部分临床工作量委托给其他全科护士,护士咨询量大大增加。然而,所有全科护士是否都能胜任这一扩展角色仍存在疑问。
进行了综合评价。搜索了九个电子数据库。如果英国的研究是在 Cochrane 综述之后发表的,即在 2004 年至 2009 年之间,那么这些研究就包括在内。
确定了八项研究,其中大多数采用定性方法。证据表明,护士角色的变化主要是由于新的全科医生合同导致的工作量增加。将工作委托给护士是在不允许患者选择的情况下在实践中组织工作量的一种手段。患者普遍认为所有的全科护士都能够处理简单的情况,但如果他们认为有必要,他们更愿意咨询全科医生。人们对护士的知识库(特别是在诊断和治疗方面)、他们在过去由全科医生承担的角色中的培训和能力水平表示担忧。
在医疗保健政策的这一关键领域,研究很少。需要为承担咨询角色的护士提供更好的培训和支持,并更好地代表患者的意见。