• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic.在一家堕胎诊所,处于生育年龄的女性在避孕和一般保健方面的决策偏好。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.021. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
2
Reproductive decision-making and determinants of contraceptive use in HIV-infected women.HIV感染女性的生殖决策及避孕措施使用的决定因素
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jun;39(2):333-43. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199606000-00008.
3
Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making.女性对避孕咨询和决策的偏好。
Contraception. 2013 Aug;88(2):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
4
An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion.堕胎时感知到的避孕强制行为探究。
Contraception. 2018 Apr;97(4):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making.最重要的是什么?患者和提供者在避孕决策中信息优先级的内容及一致性。
Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):280-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
6
Pregnancy preferences and contraceptive use among US women.美国女性的妊娠偏好和避孕措施使用情况。
Contraception. 2020 Feb;101(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
History of unintended pregnancy and patterns of contraceptive use among racial and ethnic minority women veterans.少数民族裔女性退伍军人的意外怀孕史和避孕方式使用模式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;223(4):564.e1-564.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.042. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.“我在潜意识里将恐惧投射到她们身上”:在美国堕胎禁令背景下的避孕护理定性研究
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9.
9
"You better use the safer one… leave this one": the role of health providers in women's pursuit of their preferred family planning methods.“你最好使用更安全的那个……放弃这个”:卫生服务提供者在妇女追求其首选计划生育方法方面的作用。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01034-1.
10
Relationship between women's decision-making power over their own health care and use of modern contraception in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a cross-sectional secondary data analysis.刚果民主共和国妇女对自身保健的决策权与现代避孕措施使用之间的关系:一项横断面二次数据分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01450-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare provider communication and current contraceptive use among transgender men and gender-diverse people: Results from an online, cross-sectional survey in the United States.医疗服务提供者与跨性别男性及性别多样化人群之间的沟通及当前避孕措施的使用情况:美国一项在线横断面调查的结果
Contraception. 2025 Apr;144:110784. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110784. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
How do contraception preferences change over time? .避孕偏好如何随时间变化?
Saudi Med J. 2024 Jan;45(1):93-97. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.1.20230348.
3
Typologies of interactions between abortion seekers and healthcare workers in Australia: a qualitative study exploring the impact of stigma on quality of care.澳大利亚寻求堕胎者与医护人员之间的互动类型:定性研究探索污名对护理质量的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05902-0.
4
Improvement in contraceptive knowledge after using an online educational resource.使用在线教育资源后,避孕知识得到提高。
Contraception. 2023 Oct;126:110095. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110095. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
5
The association of quality contraceptive counseling measures with postabortion contraceptive method acceptance and choice: results from client exit interviews across eight countries.质量避孕咨询措施与流产后避孕方法接受和选择的关联:来自八个国家的客户退出访谈结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):1519. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08851-0.
6
A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives on a law that allows for a 12-month supply of short-acting contraceptives in Massachusetts: Barriers and facilitators to implementation.一项关于马萨诸塞州允许提供 12 个月短效避孕药的法律的临床医生观点的定性研究:实施的障碍和促进因素。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):498-507. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14105. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Contraceptive Decision-Making and the Importance of Side Effect Information Among a Sample of Latinas.拉丁裔样本中的避孕决策与副作用信息的重要性
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Jan 31;3(1):78-84. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0115. eCollection 2022.
8
Impact of contraceptive counseling on Texans who can and cannot receive no-cost post-abortion contraception.避孕药具咨询对德克萨斯州有和没有免费堕胎后避孕的人的影响。
Contraception. 2021 Nov;104(5):512-517. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 May 30.
9
Contraceptive Method Uptake at Title X Health Centers in Utah.犹他州计划生育项目健康中心的避孕方法使用率。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 May-Jun;31(3):219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
10
What constitutes a good healthcare experience for unintended pregnancy? A qualitative study among young people in California.意外怀孕的良好医疗体验包括哪些内容?加利福尼亚州年轻人的定性研究。
Cult Health Sex. 2022 Mar;24(3):330-343. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1840631. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
"It's my body'': does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict?“这是我的身体”:患者参与决策是否会减少决策冲突?
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):522-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306782. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
2
Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health.在生殖健康方面,医疗服务提供者的建议中种族与社会阶层的交叉情况。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Oct;97(10):1803-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092585. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
3
Do people want to be autonomous patients? Preferred roles in treatment decision-making in several patient populations.人们希望成为自主的患者吗?几个患者群体在治疗决策中的偏好角色。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):248-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00441.x.
4
Clinical decision-making: physicians' preferences and experiences.临床决策:医生的偏好与经验
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Mar 15;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-10.
5
Preferences for shared decision making in chronic pain patients compared with patients during a premedication visit.慢性疼痛患者与术前访视患者在共同决策方面的偏好比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):1019-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01097.x.
6
Dilemmas in patient centeredness and shared decision making: a case for vulnerability.以患者为中心和共同决策中的困境:一个关于脆弱性的案例。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
7
The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Mar;102(1):51-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9309-6. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
8
Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.1994年和2001年美国意外怀孕率的差异。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006 Jun;38(2):90-6. doi: 10.1363/psrh.38.090.06.
9
Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.患者对信息、决策和人际行为的偏好的最佳匹配:证据、模型与干预措施
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
10
Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all.健康研究中的社会经济地位:一刀切并不适用。
JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2879-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2879.

在一家堕胎诊所,处于生育年龄的女性在避孕和一般保健方面的决策偏好。

Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.021. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.021
PMID:20650593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2997869/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Studies suggest that not all patients desire shared decision making, and little is known about decision making around contraception. This study compared decision-making preferences for contraception to preferences for general health among reproductive-aged women.

METHODS

257 women receiving abortion care in an urban hospital completed a survey which included questions adapted from the Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale about their preferences for medical decision making.

RESULTS

Women were significantly more likely to desire autonomous decision making about contraception than about their general health care (50% vs. 19%, p<.001). No patient characteristics were associated with contraceptive decision-making preferences. Women with Medicaid insurance were more likely to desire autonomous decision making about contraception than about general health care (51% vs. 17%, p<.001).

CONCLUSION

Women desire more autonomy in their contraceptive decisions than in their decisions about general health care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Health care providers should be attentive to the existence of variation in preferences in decision making across health domains. Contraceptive providers should proactively assess decisional preferences to ensure the most appropriate counseling is provided to each individual.

摘要

目的

研究表明,并非所有患者都希望共同决策,而对于避孕决策则知之甚少。本研究比较了生殖年龄段女性对避孕决策和一般健康决策的偏好。

方法

在一家城市医院接受堕胎护理的 257 名女性完成了一项调查,该调查包括了一些改编自问题解决决策量表的问题,询问了她们对医疗决策的偏好。

结果

与一般医疗保健相比,女性更倾向于对避孕做出自主决策(50%比 19%,p<.001)。没有患者特征与避孕决策偏好相关。拥有医疗补助保险的女性更倾向于对避孕做出自主决策,而不是一般医疗保健(51%比 17%,p<.001)。

结论

与一般医疗保健相比,女性在避孕决策方面更希望自主决策。

实践意义

医疗保健提供者应注意在不同健康领域的决策中存在偏好的差异。避孕提供者应主动评估决策偏好,以确保向每个个体提供最适当的咨询。